subversion-1.7.0-rc2 can pack revprops with a already rev-packed repos
If a repo is already packed by 1.6 svnadmin, then its revprops can not be
packed by 1.7 svnadmin.
Is it a bug or a feature?
Regards,
Kirby Zhou
from SOHU-RD +86-10-6272-8261
revprop packing is not a 1.7 feature. Looks like it might be included in 1.8.
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 7:21 AM, Kirby Zhou wrote:
> subversion-1.7.0-rc2 can pack revprops with a already rev-packed repos
>
> If a repo is already packed by 1.6 svnadmin, then its revprops can not be
> packed by 1.7
Sorry for the late reply. I've upgraded to TortoiseSVN 1.7 RC1, and
the problem persists (not that I had a reason to expect otherwise).
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 6:02 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 11:51:33AM +0200, Erik Faye-Lund wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 5:01 PM, Ste
> Hello
> Thank you for your response, I am still facing the issue.
>
> I do all these operations on a private home network,between 3 PCs, so I
> don't need to secure the svn server too much, I set read rights for
> anonymous access, and use http (not https).
>
> TortoiseSVN and svn commandline g
> > I'm using svn, version 1.6.16 (r1073529) on Cygwin.
>
> Concerning Cygwin, this is neither MS Windows nor Linux, and how much of
> each also depends on the way it is configured. In particular, you can
> configure
> Cygwin to use DOS-style line endings or Unix-style line endings, in order to
>
> I’m doing some testing and documentation in preparation for migrating from
> CVS to Subversion.
> I’m using svn, version 1.6.16 (r1073529) on Cygwin.
>
> I’m having some difficulty with merging to release branches that I haven’t
> been able to find a solution for (other than continuing our old C
I am a new svn administrator and also the primary user. I'm stuck on an issue
which I can't resolve and would like some help.
On a server I have svn running which I access via apache. I'm at revision 220
on this particular repository so it seems to be mostly working correctly. I
flubbed the
Sorry, my replies are bouncing and I wanted to test if this worked. Please
ignore.
2011/9/2 douglas barrett :
> apache@X hooks]$ pwd
> Y/hooks
>
> [apache@X hooks]$ ls -l pre-revprop-change
> -rwxr-xr-x. 1 apache apache 2890 Sep 2 08:39
> pre-revprop-change << so I seem to have a valid hook
>
> [apache@irvine hooks]$ tail -14 pre-revprop-change
> REPOS="$1"
"tail
>> apache@X hooks]$ pwd
>> Y/hooks
>>
>> [apache@X hooks]$ ls -l pre-revprop-change
>> -rwxr-xr-x. 1 apache apache 2890 Sep 2 08:39
>> pre-revprop-change << so I seem to have a valid hook
>>
>> [apache@irvine hooks]$ tail -14 pre-revprop-change
>> REPOS="$1"
>
>
>"tail" does n
On 9/2/2011 7:18 PM, douglas barrett wrote:
[apache@X hooks]$ head -1 pre-revprop-change
#!/bin/sh
{
As a side point the "shebang" is not required for a shell script
to run.
[apache@X tmp]$ echo "echo \$*" > ./Echo
[apache@X tmp]$ cat ./Echo
echo $*
[apache@X tmp]$ chmod
2011/9/3 douglas barrett :
>
>>> apache@X hooks]$ pwd
>>> Y/hooks
>>>
>>> [apache@X hooks]$ ls -l pre-revprop-change
>>> -rwxr-xr-x. 1 apache apache 2890 Sep 2 08:39
>>> pre-revprop-change << so I seem to have a valid hook
>>>
>>> [apache@irvine hooks]$ tail -14 pre-revprop-change
>>
12 matches
Mail list logo
