On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 7:33 AM, Ajay Pawar ajay.pa...@kpitcummins.com wrote:
Hi Lorenz,
Scenario #1
Thanks for your quick response but when I add the same file in repo browser
and then take an update it is showing me the same size .
SVN will not transmit the entire file contents if it
Hi
As a result of merging from trunk to a branch using a 1.7 svn client. Several
directories now have conflicts. For example, directory 'Documents' contains
dir_conflicts.prej, which contains:
Trying to delete property 'svn:mergeinfo'
but the local property value is different.
(local property
Guten Tag Ajay Pawar,
am Montag, 29. April 2013 um 12:08 schrieben Sie:
I added a new file XYZ.ppt which is of size 984 kb but still the client shows
0 kb.
As already said, Subversion uses delta transmission, compresses
content on transmission and my even use some kind of
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 12:17 PM, Thorsten Schöning
tschoen...@am-soft.de wrote:
Guten Tag Ajay Pawar,
am Montag, 29. April 2013 um 12:08 schrieben Sie:
I added a new file XYZ.ppt which is of size 984 kb but still the client
shows 0 kb.
As already said, Subversion uses delta transmission,
There is definitely a bug in the display of the data transfer progress.
See here for an old discussion on the tortoisesvn-users list:
http://tortoisesvn.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=4061dsMessageId=2991921
But it seems the root cause is somewhere in SVN. It has to do with issue
3260:
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 1:16 PM, Martin Bischoff tin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 12:26 PM, Johan Corveleyn jcor...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 12:17 PM, Thorsten Schöning
tschoen...@am-soft.de wrote:
Guten Tag Ajay Pawar,
am Montag, 29. April 2013 um 12:08
I repeatedly get this message in my server log.
Googling has shown that I'm not alone, although not everyone reports the
message coming from svn. Other than that, it has shed little light on
what the problem might be apart from it being somehow related to SASL.
My SVN server is not using SASL
Is there a way to do product backlogging with subversion? I'm looking for a way
to manage tasks associated with projects where I can prioritize tasks that
might hopefully be something like a plugin or extension of subversion.
Currently I have subversion running on a linux server and we're using
-Original Message-
From: Ryan Tarrant [mailto:rtarr...@neibenefits.org]
Sent: 29 April 2013 15:19
To: users@subversion.apache.org
Subject: backlogging with subversion?
Is there a way to do product backlogging with subversion? I'm
looking for a way to manage tasks associated with
Thanks! I'm starting to get the Trac setup on my windows client, but would it
make more sense to put this on my linux server?
Ryan J. Tarrant
Software Engineer
National Elevator Industry Benefit Plans
Telephone: 1-610-325-9100 EXT. 2217
Fax: 1-610-557-4505
Email: rtarr...@neibenefits.org
Trac must be installed on to the same machine that serves your subversion
repository. That should simplify your decision a bit.
chris
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 12:00 PM, Ryan Tarrant rtarr...@neibenefits.orgwrote:
Thanks! I'm starting to get the Trac setup on my windows client, but would
it
-Original Message-
From: Johan Corveleyn [mailto:jcor...@gmail.com]
Sent: maandag 29 april 2013 13:31
To: Martin Bischoff
Cc: Ajay Pawar; users@subversion.apache.org; Thorsten Schöning
Subject: Re: Tortoise SVN Issue Noticed
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 1:16 PM, Martin Bischoff
The working copy (head revision) is at 661. 177 is what I want to go back
to.
Is this the syntax to use (from within the working copy:
svn merge -r661:177?
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 8:53 PM, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 6:18 PM, C M cmanalys...@gmail.com
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 1:23 PM, C M cmanalys...@gmail.com wrote:
The working copy (head revision) is at 661. 177 is what I want to go back
to.
Is this the syntax to use (from within the working copy:
svn merge -r661:177?
Yes but that should undo all changes after 177 and you might only
On 2013-04-29 10:36, Cooke, Mark wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Edwin Cheung [mailto:edoka...@gmail.com]
Sent: 27 April 2013 07:55
To: users@subversion.apache.org
Subject: questions about subversion secondary development
Dear sir or madam:
When I use the binary packages (
Hi,
Trying to understand how merge works for svn,
I did a merge from a branch to trunk, and I get this:
Skipped 'test1.c' -- Node remains in conflict
Uhomo_script_sql.sql
Skipped 'ARBO1' -- Node remains in conflict
Uhomo_script_ddl.sql
Skipped 't.dat' -- Node remains in conflict
Skipped
For starters, figure out what the difference is between the value the
merge wants to delete (the value on the LHS of the merge) and the value
in the working copy (which had no local mods prior to running 'merge',
right?).
I wonder if the issue is that special logic for svn:mergeinfo kicks in
only
raichea wrote on Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 14:28:30 +0100:
I repeatedly get this message in my server log.
Googling has shown that I'm not alone, although not everyone reports the
message coming from svn. Other than that, it has shed little light on
what the problem might be apart from it
Cooke, Mark wrote on Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 15:30:31 +0100:
-Original Message-
From: Ryan Tarrant [mailto:rtarr...@neibenefits.org]
Sent: 29 April 2013 15:19
To: users@subversion.apache.org
Subject: backlogging with subversion?
Is there a way to do product backlogging with
On 29/04/2013 21:55, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
The fact it's commented out rather than not present implies svnserve was
built with SASL support; 'svnserve --version' will confirm that.
Just a possibly-relevant fact...
Daniel
Hmm, thanks... well, the output from that command includes:
Cyrus SASL
raichea wrote on Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 23:01:51 +0100:
On 29/04/2013 21:55, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
The fact it's commented out rather than not present implies svnserve was
built with SASL support; 'svnserve --version' will confirm that.
Just a possibly-relevant fact...
Daniel
Hmm, thanks...
21 matches
Mail list logo
