Re: SVN performance -URGENT

2013-08-01 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Aug 1, 2013, at 09:26, Bob Archer wrote: > The working copy is generally 2x the size of the files in it, since the .svn > folder contains the pristine copies of your working copy. This is how svn can > do diffs against changed items In your working copy without hitting the > server, and als

Re: SVN performance -URGENT

2013-08-01 Thread Thomas Harold
On 8/1/2013 10:52 AM, Somashekarappa, Anup (CWM-NR) wrote: Bandwidth is 35.4 MBytes/secfrom my system(London) to server(New york) when i checked with iperf tool. We are using LDAP AuthzLDAPAuthoritative off AuthType Basic AuthBasicProvider ldap AuthName "Windows Credentials" As per message afte

RE: SVN performance -URGENT

2013-08-01 Thread Bob Archer
> Bandwidth is 35.4 MBytes/sec from my system(London)  to server(New york) > when i checked with iperf tool. WOW! That is insanely fast. Are you sure its not 35 Mbps (Mega bits!!)? Google Fiber that everyone covets is 1 Gbps (Giga bit per second) or 1024 Mbps or 128 MBps. At 35 Mbps it would ta

Solved: Could not read status line: Connection reset by server

2013-08-01 Thread Weeber, Burkhard
After being plagued by this error on more and more windows servers, the solution turned out to be simple. Add http-library = serf (or neon, if you prefer that) to the servers file. It looks like svn uses a function name that might appear in other libraries also, thus pulling the wrong function

RE: SVN performance -URGENT

2013-08-01 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On 1 Aug 2013 16:52, "Somashekarappa, Anup (CWM-NR)" < anup.somashekara...@rbc.com> wrote: > > Bandwidth is 35.4 MBytes/sec from my system(London) to server(New york) when i checked with iperf tool. > > > We are using LDAP > > AuthzLDAPAuthoritative off > AuthType Basic > AuthBasicProvider ldap >

RE: SVN performance -URGENT

2013-08-01 Thread Somashekarappa, Anup (CWM-NR)
Bandwidth is 35.4 MBytes/sec from my system(London) to server(New york) when i checked with iperf tool. We are using LDAP AuthzLDAPAuthoritative off AuthType Basic AuthBasicProvider ldap AuthName "Windows Credentials" As per message after checkout in TortoiseSVN GUI = 368 Mbytes transfe

RE: SVN performance -URGENT

2013-08-01 Thread Bob Archer
Please stop top posting. > I tried in the same server where svn is hosted but there also it is taking too > much of time I e it is taking 110 mins to checkout the 2200 Mbytes of data(in > Windows it took 143 mins). > > I have not tried the command line option.Could you please tell how to do it >

RE: SVN performance -URGENT

2013-08-01 Thread kmradke
Bob Archer wrote on 08/01/2013 09:02:32 AM: > > We are using subversion 1.7 which is hosted in linux and apache isbeing used > > along with this. > > The linux is very powerful but we are facing a major issue during the SVN > > operation from the windows system. > > Windows system : Microsoft wi

RE: SVN performance -URGENT

2013-08-01 Thread kmradke
> I tried in the same server where svn is hosted but there also it is > taking too much of time I e it is taking 110 mins to checkout the > 2200 Mbytes of data(in Windows it took 143 mins). How many files are in the working copy? For example, millions of small files can take a significant amoun

RE: SVN performance -URGENT

2013-08-01 Thread Somashekarappa, Anup (CWM-NR)
Hello Bob, Thanks for your response. I tried in the same server where svn is hosted but there also it is taking too much of time I e it is taking 110 mins to checkout the 2200 Mbytes of data(in Windows it took 143 mins). I have not tried the command line option.Could you please tell how to d

RE: SVN performance -URGENT

2013-08-01 Thread Bob Archer
> Hello Team, > We are using subversion 1.7 which is hosted in linux and apache is being used > along with this. > The linux is very powerful but we are facing a major issue during the SVN > operation from the windows system. > Windows system : Microsoft windows XP > 2.85 GB of Ram > tortoisesvn 1.

SVN performance -URGENT

2013-08-01 Thread Somashekarappa, Anup (CWM-NR)
> Hello Team, > > We are using subversion 1.7 which is hosted in linux and apache is > being used along with this. > > The linux is very powerful but we are facing a major issue during the > SVN operation from the windows system. > > Windows system : Microsoft windows XP > 2.85 GB of Ram > to

Re: SVN performance -URGENT

2013-08-01 Thread Thorsten Schöning
Guten Tag Somashekarappa, Anup (CWM-NR), am Donnerstag, 1. August 2013 um 13:51 schrieben Sie: > May i know where is the bottleneck? Did you have a look at the CPU and I/O for storage and network on both client and server? Even Windows provides enough tools built-in to see if those resources are

SVN performance -URGENT

2013-08-01 Thread Somashekarappa, Anup (CWM-NR)
Hello Team, We are using subversion 1.7 which is hosted in linux and apache is being used along with this. The linux is very powerful but we are facing a major issue during the SVN operation from the windows system. Windows system : Microsoft windows XP 2.85 GB of Ram tortoisesvn 1.7 Windows

Update/Revert doesn't restore missed files

2013-08-01 Thread Sergey Azarkevich
I have working copy in which some files and directories missed: present on server but absent locally. Update, revert doesn't restore them. Also it doesn't look like sparse. Problem was resolved via clean checkout, so I only report about it and not look for solution. -- C:\temp\svn-test\solutio