Re: wc.db: corruption after move?

2013-11-27 Thread Marc Strapetz
On 26.11.2013 21:38, Philip Martin wrote: > Marc Strapetz writes: > > As far as I have been told, this has already been fixed and backported > to 1.8.5. Still, for those users which already have this corruption, is > there a way to recover their working copies with standard Subversion

RE: wc.db: corruption after move?

2013-11-27 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: Marc Strapetz [mailto:marc.strap...@syntevo.com] > Sent: woensdag 27 november 2013 09:30 > To: Philip Martin > Cc: Branko Čibej; users@subversion.apache.org > Subject: Re: wc.db: corruption after move? > > On 26.11.2013 21:38, Philip Martin wrote: > > Marc St

RE: SVN lock at version 1.8.3 and 1.8.4 - not working

2013-11-27 Thread Kovar, Vaclav (EOM)
>What output does your 'pre-lock' hook template produce? >My guess would be that it produces something... Hello, My repo hasnt any active hooks, just templates in hooks dir. So as first i tried to run almost empty pre-lock hook and strange is, the batch file is not executed. Next step was to ver

RE: SVN lock at version 1.8.3 and 1.8.4 - not working

2013-11-27 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: Kovar, Vaclav (EOM) [mailto:vaclav.ko...@skoda-auto.cz] > Sent: woensdag 27 november 2013 13:10 > To: users@subversion.apache.org > Subject: RE: SVN lock at version 1.8.3 and 1.8.4 - not working > > >What output does your 'pre-lock' hook template produce? > >

RE: Hardware requirements for windows subversion

2013-11-27 Thread Edward Ned Harvey (svn4)
> From: Ram [mailto:house4rent...@yahoo.com] > Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2013 7:33 PM > > Hello, > I am looking to use subversion for .Net applications. What type of > hardware do I need? What version of windows server, RAM, hard disk space > do > I need? If you can run windows, you can run

Re: Can't access SVN repos from command Line: Server SSL certificate untrusted

2013-11-27 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Edward Ned Harvey (svn4) wrote on Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 01:47:11 +: > What are the important details and/or original post that I'm missing? You could read the original post in the list archives... http://svn.haxx.se/users/archive-2013-11/

RE: SVN lock at version 1.8.3 and 1.8.4 - not working

2013-11-27 Thread Kovar, Vaclav (EOM)
>If your script really has 'echo off' and not '@echo off' then your script >produces output. And you should check the documentation on how that is handled >for the specific hooks. For pre-lock this has side effects: >[[ ># If the hook program outputs anything on stdout, the output string will # b

RE: Hardware requirements for windows subversion

2013-11-27 Thread Ram
Hi Edward, Thank you for your response. I have a .net site the file size is 2 GB. There are only 2 developers working on this project remotely. Do I need windows server or windows 7? What kind of hardware, RAM, diskspace do I need? Do I still need Apache server? Where can i get Subversion insta

Re: Hardware requirements for windows subversion

2013-11-27 Thread Pavel Lyalyakin
Hello Ram, > Thank you for your response. I have a .net site the file size is 2 GB. > There are only 2 developers working on this project remotely. Do I need > windows server or windows 7? What kind of hardware, RAM, diskspace do I > need? Do I still need Apache server? Where can i get Subvers

Re: wc.db: corruption after move?

2013-11-27 Thread Marc Strapetz
On 27.11.2013 11:32, Bert Huijben wrote: > > >> -Original Message- >> From: Marc Strapetz [mailto:marc.strap...@syntevo.com] >> Sent: woensdag 27 november 2013 09:30 >> To: Philip Martin >> Cc: Branko Čibej; users@subversion.apache.org >> Subject: Re: wc.db: corruption after move? >> >> O

Re: Hardware requirements for windows subversion

2013-11-27 Thread Ram
Thank you all for your help. -- View this message in context: http://subversion.1072662.n5.nabble.com/Hardware-requirements-for-windows-subversion-tp185979p186007.html Sent from the Subversion Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Branch/switch/merge question

2013-11-27 Thread Les Mikesell
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 8:02 PM, Edward Ned Harvey (svn4) wrote: > > > At first, I was doing a sparse checkout. I non-recursively checked out /, > and then I made /trunk fully recursive, and then I went one level deeper into > /branches, and then I made /branches/eharvey fully recursive... And