Re: Bug report on SVN 1.8.3 Cannot allocate Memory

2013-12-12 Thread Henrik Carlqvist
> We will get with our System Admin and see what is going there. The command "dmesg" might also give a clue on Linux systems. regards Henrik

Re: Bug report on SVN 1.8.3 Cannot allocate Memory

2013-12-12 Thread Thorsten Schöning
Guten Tag Nguyen, Quyen, am Donnerstag, 12. Dezember 2013 um 23:12 schrieben Sie: > svn: E165002: Failed to start '/../../../hooks/start-commit' hook It may help to provide your hook's source to the list, just in case there's an error in it like a wrong shebang, wrong line endings or stuff like t

RE: Bug report on SVN 1.8.3 Cannot allocate Memory

2013-12-12 Thread Nguyen, Quyen
Thank you for your input Ben. We will get with our System Admin and see what is going there. Quyen Nguyen -Original Message- From: Ben Reser [mailto:b...@reser.org] Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2013 3:37 PM To: Nguyen, Quyen; users@subversion.apache.org Cc: Vornbrock, Beth Subject: Re: Bu

Re: Bug report on SVN 1.8.3 Cannot allocate Memory

2013-12-12 Thread Ben Reser
On 12/12/13 2:12 PM, Nguyen, Quyen wrote: > Looking into the subversion error_log and it appears it point to the memory > > [Mon Nov 18 17:28:53 2013] [error] [client 10.20.36.51] Can't start process > '/data00start-commit': Cannot allocate memory [500, #12] That is an OS error. Subversion

Bug report on SVN 1.8.3 Cannot allocate Memory

2013-12-12 Thread Nguyen, Quyen
Hi, We had subversion 1.8.3 installed on our test server. svn, version 1.8.3 (r1516576) compiled Aug 30 2013, 17:19:00 on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu The OS on this server is OS Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 6.3 (Santiago) . Initially, testing 1.8.3 on this test server looks good but then

Re: help with svn:ignore

2013-12-12 Thread Thorsten Schöning
Guten Tag Hinote, Scotty (MSFC-IS40)[NICS], am Donnerstag, 12. Dezember 2013 um 21:38 schrieben Sie: > I then moved the files with my Perl script. You should provide the lines which implement the rename and the commit of the deleted and newly added files. > It appears from the > output of "svn l

Re: Tools for projecting growth of repository storage?

2013-12-12 Thread Mark Phippard
On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 7:58 PM, Eric Johnson wrote: > Anyone have a suggestion for a tool that projects the growth of repository > storage. > > I've got repos taking over 75% of a disk volume, and I'm curious to > project out when I'll need new storage. > > Obviously, this is approximate, but has

RE: help with svn:ignore

2013-12-12 Thread Hinote, Scotty (MSFC-IS40)[NICS]
Hi Bob, I appreciate the reply. A few more details that may help. I wrote a Perl script to move the files from the old name to the new name. During the first round there were some issues with renaming so I had to restore a backup of the repository. I created a new directory then restored my dum

RE: help with svn:ignore

2013-12-12 Thread Bob Archer
> I am using Subversion 1.6.11-10 on Red Hat Enterprise 5.8. The repository is > strictly for RANCID and I recently renamed several files in my repository with > the "svn move" command. After making these changes I found that I can no > longer see the file history for the renamed files in my reposi

Re: Update-Only Checkout Enhancement

2013-12-12 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Bob Archer wrote on Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 21:05:46 +: > There may be some transactional file systems that allow you to get an > event before the modification is committed to the file system so you > can access the original copy, but I think they are few and far > between. And also would require

help with svn:ignore

2013-12-12 Thread Hinote, Scotty (MSFC-IS40)[NICS]
Hi All, I am using Subversion 1.6.11-10 on Red Hat Enterprise 5.8. The repository is strictly for RANCID and I recently renamed several files in my repository with the "svn move" command. After making these changes I found that I can no longer see the file history for the renamed files in my re

Re: Tools for projecting growth of repository storage?

2013-12-12 Thread Thomas Harold
On 12/2/2013 7:58 PM, Eric Johnson wrote: Anyone have a suggestion for a tool that projects the growth of repository storage. I've got repos taking over 75% of a disk volume, and I'm curious to project out when I'll need new storage. Obviously, this is approximate, but has anyone got a tool for

Re: Update-Only Checkout Enhancement

2013-12-12 Thread Thomas Harold
On 12/11/2013 2:19 PM, Bob Archer wrote: On 11.12.2013 17:21, Mark Kneisler wrote: I think making the pristine files optional would work for me. Here’s an idea. Instead of having pristine copies of all files, how about adding to the pristine directory only when a file is changed? You k

Re: Update-Only Checkout Enhancement

2013-12-12 Thread Thomas Harold
On 12/10/2013 8:45 PM, Mark Kneisler wrote: I have several environments where I’d like to use a SVN checkout, but where I’d never ever want to make changes to the files or perform a commit. For these environments, I’d only want to perform an update or an update to revision. In cases where you

Re: Update-Only Checkout Enhancement

2013-12-12 Thread Les Mikesell
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 4:02 AM, Branko Čibej wrote: > >> Some things... But not the things you really need to complete any >> amount of actual work - like updates and commits. > > You're forgetting diff. If you use Subversion daily, you've become so > used to it being local that you can't apprec

RE: Update-Only Checkout Enhancement

2013-12-12 Thread Gleason, Todd
> From: Ben Reser [mailto:b...@reser.org] > Absolutely, the answer here isn't a one size fits all. Nobody is > objecting to > the idea of allowing this. The problem is that the code is not > designed to > allow this and it's a ton of work to change that. I can think of a > good 10 > other things

Re: how to svn merge with multiple revision numbers - quick question

2013-12-12 Thread Branko Čibej
On 12.12.2013 07:32, Zk W wrote: > Hi All > > We have a few revision numbers on trunk that we like to block but they > are not in consecutive order - i.e. rev numbers 1,5,8,10,11 > We like to merge from trunk to a branch but would like to block them > on the branch. > > What's the correct syntax fo

Re: Update-Only Checkout Enhancement

2013-12-12 Thread Branko Čibej
On 12.12.2013 08:30, Les Mikesell wrote: > On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 11:01 PM, Ryan Schmidt > wrote: >> On Dec 11, 2013, at 19:19, Les Mikesell wrote: >> >> Also, it would mean you would need a constant connection to the server to > use a subversion working copy. >>> That's hardly a problem