such serious issues ever since version 1.3
(1.0/1.1 were a very different matter and had us dropping SVN
altogether until 1.3 after coming all the way through 0.24). No
other programs were added/updated recently.
Thank you for your attention.
Jan Hendrik
Am 22.12.2011 um 12:05 schrieb Mat Booth:
> On 22 December 2011 10:37, Hendrik Fuß wrote:
>> Am 22.12.2011 um 11:24 schrieb vishwajeet singh:
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 2:23 PM, Hendrik wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi folks,
>>>
>>> is it sa
Am 22.12.2011 um 11:24 schrieb vishwajeet singh:
> On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 2:23 PM, Hendrik wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> is it safe to access a repository via local file:// protocol on a
> server that also runs apache2 and mod_dav_svn? I'd like to create tags
> locally on t
Hi folks,
is it safe to access a repository via local file:// protocol on a
server that also runs apache2 and mod_dav_svn? I'd like to create tags
locally on the server to avoid some authentication headaches.
cheers
Hendrik
Concerning Re: svnadmin load to fsfs 9 times f
Ulrich Eckhardt wrote on 31 May 2010, 10:30, at least in part:
> On Sunday 30 May 2010, B Smith-Mannschott wrote:
> > I've never really been much of a user of the BDB back end. I
> > started with Subversion in the 1.3 time-frame and have always used
Concerning Re: Tigris binary packages for Wind
Olivier Sannier wrote on 3 Mar 2010, 11:27, at least in part:
> Troy Simpson wrote:
> > For base-level support, we narrowed that down to apache 2.2x. Do we really
> > need to support all the python builds? They were a great service from D.J.
> > Heap
Hi all!
I know and appreciate that the binaries are provided by volunteers,
so please take this at the actual value of the subject: as a question
not of when, but on the status.
Checking now and then for new versions at tigris there are only
binaries for 1.6.6 from late October. Getting kind
