From: C L [mailto:cl_...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, July 31, 2011 8:52 PM
To: users@subversion.apache.org
Subject: branch sync with unversioned files results in versioned file being
deleted when reintegrated
Hey all,
I found this oddity today with a branch which had an unversioned file in a
-Original Message-
From: Bob Archer [mailto:bob.arc...@amsi.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2011 2:20 PM
To: Michael Fletcher; users@subversion.apache.org
Subject: RE: Apparently Spurious svn:merginfo
We are having problems with a large number of svn:mergeinfo
properties
being
Now that I have a 1.7-alpha client, I gave this scenario I posted last month
another try, and it works fine. Not a problem for 1.7.
-Steve
From: Varnau, Steve (Neoview)
Sent: Monday, May 09, 2011 6:06 PM
To: users@subversion.apache.org
Cc: Brackett, Faye
Subject: Merge tracking bug - inherited
From: Geoff Hoffman [mailto:ghoff...@cardinalpath.com]
Sent: Friday, June 10, 2011 3:26 PM
To: users@subversion.apache.org
Subject: Subversion 1.6 on Ubuntu Server 11.x
I posted about this on the Ubuntu forums but thus far nobody has replied.
When SSH'd into the box and using svn operations,
-Original Message-
From: Dirk Heinrichs [mailto:dirk.heinri...@capgemini.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2011 3:31 AM
To: users@subversion.apache.org
Subject: Re: Possible bug: --stop-on-copy stops too early
Am Dienstag, 24. Mai 2011, 12:22:44 schrieb Stephen Butler:
The A, along
Christopher,
The problem is not with your perl code. Apparently, update returns success if
you give it a path that does not exist in the current working directory.
Ø svn update foobar
At revision 3158.
Ø echo $?
0
For Svn 1.6.15, anyway. Seems to hold for linux windows.
-Steve
From:
PM
To: Varnau, Steve (Neoview); users@subversion.apache.org
Subject: RE: SVN question
Steve,
Thank you for taking the time.
I also saw thisI was wondering what users do to get something similar
working.
The same thing happens under Perforce. The command p4 always returns a
successful exit
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Shahaf [mailto:d...@daniel.shahaf.name]
Sent: Monday, May 23, 2011 2:37 PM
To: Varnau, Steve (Neoview)
Cc: Hahn, Christopher (SAN DIEGO); users@subversion.apache.org
Subject: Re: SVN question
'svn up nonexistent' will pull in a file
Greetings,
I have a merge tracking bug to report. It seems like there are a lot of steps
to re-produce it, but we discovered this in the real world, and it took a long
while to figure out what was going on and to re-produce it.
We are running 1.6.15 clients. We have lots of branching, and
-Original Message-
From: Johan Corveleyn [mailto:jcor...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2011 1:47 AM
To: Varnau, Steve (Neoview)
Cc: users@subversion.apache.org
Subject: Re: Merge Conflict on Windows with eol-style mergeinfo
properties
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 12:56 AM
Hi,
I could not find this issue in the issue tracker. We're trying to keep the
svn:mergeinfo properties on top-level directories, but I found a few text
files in our repository that have the property. When a merge is done that
should be just a branch synch-up merge, the files are marked as
-Original Message-
From: Stefan Sperling [mailto:s...@elego.de]
Sent: Monday, February 14, 2011 9:54 AM
To: Varnau, Steve (Neoview)
Cc: Daniel Becroft; users@subversion.apache.org
Subject: Re: Dangerous to keep re-integrated branches alive?
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 05:41:03PM
-Original Message-
From: Stefan Sperling [mailto:s...@elego.de]
Sent: Monday, February 14, 2011 11:27 AM
To: Varnau, Steve (Neoview)
Cc: Daniel Becroft; users@subversion.apache.org
Subject: Re: Dangerous to keep re-integrated branches alive?
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 06:05:26PM
Hi all,
My development group uses quite a bit of branching. I'm trying to train folks
to delete a task branch once it is integrated and create a new one for the next
task. Of course the svnbook gives the recipe for Keeping a reintegrated branch
alive, by using a record-only merge to block the
It should only use gnome if it is specified in your config file
(~/.subversion/config):
password-stores = gnome-keyring
-Steve
From: Jeremy Wall [mailto:jw...@google.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2010 9:11 AM
To: Varnau, Steve (Neoview)
Cc: users@subversion.apache.org
Subject: Re: Possible bug
Also, I guess it could be getting options from system-wide config
(/etc/subversion on linux).
-Steve
-Original Message-
From: Mark Phippard [mailto:markp...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2010 9:29 AM
To: Jeremy Wall
Cc: Varnau, Steve (Neoview); users@subversion.apache.org
Subject
16 matches
Mail list logo
