Daniel Shahaf писал(а) в своём письме Wed, 14 Jun
2017 20:47:16 +0300:
The first column of `status` output reports not only the in-wc.db status
(e.g., 'A' / 'D' / 'R'), but also the on-disk status, e.g., '?' and '!'.
For example, compare how after 'svn add iota &&
Andrey wrote on Wed, 14 Jun 2017 14:31 +0300:
> Bert Huijben писал(а) в своём письме Wed, 14 Jun 2017
> 13:29:18 +0300:
>
> >> So, what about this issues? I see it as not opened yet. Will it be
> >> fixed?
> >
> > It is not easy to really describe 'the issue'.
> >
> > How
Bert Huijben писал(а) в своём письме Wed, 14 Jun 2017
13:29:18 +0300:
So, what about this issues? I see it as not opened yet. Will it be
fixed?
It is not easy to really describe 'the issue'.
How would you handle 'svn rm --keep-local ', where the current
behavior is the
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrey [mailto:an...@inbox.ru]
> Sent: woensdag 14 juni 2017 12:22
> To: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: "svn status" does not show unversioned items been deleted but
> not committed
>
> So, what about this
So, what about this issues? I see it as not opened yet. Will it be fixed?
Stefan Sperling писал(а) в своём письме Thu, 18 May 2017
15:52:17 +0300:
On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 03:09:51PM +0300, Andrey wrote:
If i'll revert it then i'll LOSE CHANGES
Of course. That is the entire point of this command.
$ svn help revert
revert: Restore pristine working
On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 2:03 PM, Andrey wrote:
>>> As you see the file1.txt is missed in second status output as
>>> unversioned and so can be missed from add before a commit.
>>
>> It's not unversioned, it's in the "deleted" state. You can't have both,
>> since you can revert the
As you see the file1.txt is missed in second status output as
unversioned and so can be missed from add before a commit.
It's not unversioned, it's in the "deleted" state. You can't have both,
since you can revert the deletion.
If i'll revert it then i'll LOSE CHANGES because the svn will
As you see the file1.txt is missed in second status output as
unversioned and so can be missed from add before a commit.
It's not unversioned, it's in the "deleted" state. You can't have both,
since you can revert the deletion.
If i'll revert it then i'll LOSE CHANGES because the svn will
On 17.05.2017 19:50, Andrey wrote:
> As a result, for example, you can not say by "svn status" command
> which file you forgot to add.
>
> Reproduction batch script for windows:
> ```
> @echo off
>
> set REPODIR=test_repo
> set "REPOROOT=%~dp0%REPODIR%"
> set "REPOURL=file:///%REPOROOT:\=/%"
> set
10 matches
Mail list logo