RE: Issue in svn E195020

2015-04-06 Thread Scott Aron Bloom
> > = > I did notice that... (the version being the same for Prerequisites) > > Here is the line from the externals definition > > -r 28594 ^/externals/microsoft/Prerequisites Prerequisites > > It is a directory, that contains the VS 2013 and VS 2008 pre-req distribution >

Re: Issue in svn E195020

2015-04-06 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 5:11 PM, Scott Aron Bloom wrote: > [ As an aside: this list prefers bottom-posting (i.e. putting your reply at > the bottom) or inline replying, if possible. Also, plain-text is preferred, > but I'll manage :-). See more below ... ] > [ Understood... too many mailing lis

RE: Issue in svn E195020

2015-04-01 Thread Scott Aron Bloom
[ As an aside: this list prefers bottom-posting (i.e. putting your reply at the bottom) or inline replying, if possible. Also, plain-text is preferred, but I'll manage :-). See more below ... ] [ Understood... too many mailing lists.. ] On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 3:36 AM, Scott Aron Bloom wrote:

Re: Issue in svn E195020

2015-04-01 Thread Johan Corveleyn
[ As an aside: this list prefers bottom-posting (i.e. putting your reply at the bottom) or inline replying, if possible. Also, plain-text is preferred, but I'll manage :-). See more below ... ] On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 3:36 AM, Scott Aron Bloom wrote: > Here is some more info: > > First I show the

RE: Issue in svn E195020

2015-03-31 Thread Scott Aron Bloom
mixed-revision working copy [28594:29395]; try updating first From: Scott Aron Bloom [mailto:sc...@towel42.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2015 6:46 AM To: Johan Corveleyn Cc: users@subversion.apache.org Subject: RE: Issue in svn E195020 Sorry, I misunderstood your question. Sv

RE: Issue in svn E195020

2015-03-31 Thread Scott Aron Bloom
] Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2015 6:46 AM To: Johan Corveleyn Cc: users@subversion.apache.org Subject: RE: Issue in svn E195020 Sorry, I misunderstood your question. Svn up succeeds but does not fix th3 svn merge issue. I'll look at the stack overflow issue since we do have a bunch of

RE: Issue in svn E195020

2015-03-31 Thread Scott Aron Bloom
Bloom Cc: users@subversion.apache.org Subject: Re: Issue in svn E195020 On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 2:56 AM, Scott Aron Bloom wrote: > > > > ~~Scott > > Original message > From: Johan Corveleyn > Date:03/30/2015 12:48 (GMT-08:00) > To: Scott Aron Bloom &

Re: Issue in svn E195020

2015-03-31 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 2:56 AM, Scott Aron Bloom wrote: > > > > ~~Scott > > Original message > From: Johan Corveleyn > Date:03/30/2015 12:48 (GMT-08:00) > To: Scott Aron Bloom > Cc: users@subversion.apache.org > Subject: Re: Issue in svn E

RE: Issue in svn E195020

2015-03-30 Thread Scott Aron Bloom
~~Scott Original message From: Johan Corveleyn Date:03/30/2015 12:48 (GMT-08:00) To: Scott Aron Bloom Cc: users@subversion.apache.org Subject: Re: Issue in svn E195020 > Its has been common, that after the merge, if another merge is attempted we > get the E195020

Re: Issue in svn E195020

2015-03-30 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 5:58 PM, Scott Aron Bloom wrote: > Running svn from tortoise (1.8.11 r1643975) but we have the same issue with > the same version from VisualSVN, as well as the collabnet on linux > > > > Unfortunately, this is going to be a problem to duplicate this since its > only on our

Issue in svn E195020

2015-03-30 Thread Scott Aron Bloom
Running svn from tortoise (1.8.11 r1643975) but we have the same issue with the same version from VisualSVN, as well as the collabnet on linux Unfortunately, this is going to be a problem to duplicate this since its only on our full source repository. We work with a bunch of branches, but somet