After playing around with snvnotify, I notice all it does is use the
SNV::Notify class. I'll just add the option to use SNV::Notify if you
happen to have the module installed.
--
David Weintraub
qazw...@gmail.com
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 10:27 AM, David Weintraub wrote:
> I'm looking at the SVN:Notify, and it appears to require sendmail. Is
> that correct? I would rather use NET::SMTP which is more platform
> neutral.
>
> What does the NET::SMTP notification look like? Does it do a diff
> between files? Doe
I'm looking at the SVN:Notify, and it appears to require sendmail. Is
that correct? I would rather use NET::SMTP which is more platform
neutral.
What does the NET::SMTP notification look like? Does it do a diff
between files? Does it tell you all the files modified, or just the
ones you're interes
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 1:15 AM, David Weintraub wrote:
> The idea is to allow users to specify exactly which they want to
> watch. It might be a few configuration files, images, etc.
>
> Hudson will notify if any files in the entire project are changed, and
> when you do a dozen builds each day, t
The idea is to allow users to specify exactly which they want to
watch. It might be a few configuration files, images, etc.
Hudson will notify if any files in the entire project are changed, and
when you do a dozen builds each day, the developers start to ignore
these build notices.
This is somet
On 3/8/2010 4:56 PM, David Weintraub wrote:
CommitNotifier uses Tortoise and SVN Notifier uses MS .NET platform.
Both are Windows specific, and we have a really mixed office. We have
people on Linux, Windows, and Mac.
Hudson should run on about anything. It does have to poll for changes
but it
CommitNotifier uses Tortoise and SVN Notifier uses MS .NET platform.
Both are Windows specific, and we have a really mixed office. We have
people on Linux, Windows, and Mac.
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 5:49 PM, Daniel Becroft wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 2:26 AM, David Weintraub wrote:
>>
>> One o
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 2:26 AM, David Weintraub wrote:
> One of the tech leads wants to be able to program a watch file, so
> that when a certain set of developers change a particular file,
> certain other developers get notified. Thus, we need to be able to
> program what files, what developers
I'm almost finished my second notification scheme. Each user their own
watch file. In my access-control trigger, I can easily set it up, so
that users can only change their own watch files:
[FILE Lock Watch directory as read-only]
file = ^/watchers/.*
access = read-only
users = @AL
Greetings, David Weintraub!
> On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 11:39 PM, Andrey Repin wrote:
>> Sorry, my head is a bit crippled for now, and your post contains too much
>> cross-references to be understandable in my current state.
>> Could you please put it in simple terms, how you see your potential syst
On 3/3/2010 11:06 AM, Bob Archer wrote:
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 11:39 PM, Andrey Repin
wrote:
Sorry, my head is a bit crippled for now, and your post contains too
much
cross-references to be understandable in my current state.
Could you please put it in simple terms, how you see your potential
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 12:06 PM, Bob Archer wrote:
> I do this kind of stuff with cruise control. It will watch for check-ins and
> kick of tasks
> which can include emails if you want. I tie this in with CI builds... of
> course, cruise control
> doesn't have to run a build... it could just do
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 10:09 AM, Larry Shatzer, Jr. wrote:>
> A while ago, I wrote something on top of SVN::Notify with a similar feature,
> of having a property define who got an email. I threw it up on CPAN
> at http://search.cpan.org/~larrysh/SVN-Notify-Filter-Watchers-0.09/ It
> worked pretty
> On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 11:39 PM, Andrey Repin
> wrote:
> > Sorry, my head is a bit crippled for now, and your post contains too
> much
> > cross-references to be understandable in my current state.
> > Could you please put it in simple terms, how you see your potential
> system
> > works?
>
> W
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 11:39 PM, Andrey Repin wrote:
> Sorry, my head is a bit crippled for now, and your post contains too much
> cross-references to be understandable in my current state.
> Could you please put it in simple terms, how you see your potential system
> works?
We have both developm
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 1:57 AM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
>
> Some time ago, we were thinking of maintaining some
> notification-configuration inside versioned properties on directories
> in svn. The idea was simply to be able to put a (comma-separated, or
> new-line separated or whatever) list of e
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 5:39 AM, Andrey Repin wrote:
> Greetings, David Weintraub!
>
>> One of the tech leads wants to be able to program a watch file, so
>> that when a certain set of developers change a particular file,
>> certain other developers get notified. Thus, we need to be able to
>> prog
Greetings, David Weintraub!
> One of the tech leads wants to be able to program a watch file, so
> that when a certain set of developers change a particular file,
> certain other developers get notified. Thus, we need to be able to
> program what files, what developers do the commit, and what deve
One of the tech leads wants to be able to program a watch file, so
that when a certain set of developers change a particular file,
certain other developers get notified. Thus, we need to be able to
program what files, what developers do the commit, and what developers
receive the notification. I'd
19 matches
Mail list logo