Re: Archiving Projects (End-Of-Life)

2010-12-17 Thread David Weintraub
> On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 8:50 AM, Andy Levy wrote: > > If you just need to set the whole directory read-only unilaterally, > you don't need a pre-commit hook; just use the built-in path-based > authorization. On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 12:57 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > Well, no, you don't *need

Re: Archiving Projects (End-Of-Life)

2010-12-15 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 8:50 AM, Andy Levy wrote: > If you just need to set the whole directory read-only unilaterally, > you don't need a pre-commit hook; just use the built-in path-based > authorization. Well, no, you don't *need* to do it that way. But each access method has its own access co

Re: Archiving Projects (End-Of-Life)

2010-12-15 Thread Andy Levy
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 06:44, Johan Corveleyn wrote: > On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 10:23 PM, David Weintraub wrote: >> On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 3:04 PM, Johan Corveleyn wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I'm wondering if there is a (de-facto) standard way of "end-of-lifing" >>> projects in an SVN repository, or

Re: Archiving Projects (End-Of-Life)

2010-12-15 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 10:23 PM, David Weintraub wrote: > On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 3:04 PM, Johan Corveleyn wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I'm wondering if there is a (de-facto) standard way of "end-of-lifing" >> projects in an SVN repository, or any suggestions for this from other >> users on this list ...

Re: Archiving Projects (End-Of-Life)

2010-12-14 Thread Thorsten Schöning
Guten Tag Nick Stolwijk, am Dienstag, 14. Dezember 2010 um 12:03 schrieben Sie: > Another easy one. ;) Using separate repositories for projects makes access control a lot easier and safer: Depending on using svnserve, one has the chance to use different instances for svnserve on different ports f

Re: Archiving Projects (End-Of-Life)

2010-12-14 Thread Nick Stolwijk
You cannot easily refactor code into seperate modules, used by multiple projects, with keeping of history. Another easy one. ;) Hth, Nick Stolwijk ~Senior Java Developer~ iPROFS Wagenweg 208 2012 NM Haarlem T +31 23 547 6369 F +31 23 547 6370 I www.iprofs.nl On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 11:02 AM,

Re: Archiving Projects (End-Of-Life)

2010-12-14 Thread Johan Corveleyn
to:ulrich.eckha...@dominolaser.com] >> Sent: 14 December 2010 10:53 >> To: users@subversion.apache.org >> Subject: Re: Archiving Projects (End-Of-Life) >> >> You don't need svnadmin to create a new project. >> >> That was simple! :'D >> >&

RE: Archiving Projects (End-Of-Life)

2010-12-14 Thread Cooke, Mark
gt; To: users@subversion.apache.org > Subject: Re: Archiving Projects (End-Of-Life) > > You don't need svnadmin to create a new project. > > That was simple! :'D > > Uli > ...but I don't see that as a problem for us, it's just a little pain occasionally for

Re: Archiving Projects (End-Of-Life)

2010-12-14 Thread Ulrich Eckhardt
On Tuesday 14 December 2010, Cooke, Mark wrote: > I'd be interested in any strong arguments for using one repo over many! You don't need svnadmin to create a new project. That was simple! :'D Uli -- ML: http://subversion.apache.org/docs/community-guide/mailing-lists.html FAQ: http://subversion

RE: Archiving Projects (End-Of-Life)

2010-12-14 Thread Cooke, Mark
> -Original Message- > From: Johan Corveleyn [mailto:jcor...@gmail.com] > Sent: 13 December 2010 20:04 > To: users@subversion.apache.org > Subject: Archiving Projects (End-Of-Life) > > Hi, > > I'm wondering if there is a (de-facto) standard way of "end-of-lifing" > projects in an SVN rep

RE: Archiving Projects (End-Of-Life)

2010-12-14 Thread Giulio Troccoli
> Linedata Limited Registered Office: 85 Gracechurch St., London, EC3V 0AA Registered in England and Wales No 3475006 VAT Reg No 710 3140 03 -Original Message- > From: Johan Corveleyn [mailto:jcor...@gmail.com] > Sent: 13 December 2010 20:04 > To: users@subversion.apache.org > Subject:

Re: Archiving Projects (End-Of-Life)

2010-12-13 Thread Thorsten Schöning
Guten Tag Johan Corveleyn, am Montag, 13. Dezember 2010 um 21:04 schrieben Sie: > I know I could just "svn rm" them, but some of the "project owners" > feel a little bit uneasy about that. They consider it "probable" that > they will need to take another look at them sometime in the future. > And

Re: Archiving Projects (End-Of-Life)

2010-12-13 Thread Ulrich Eckhardt
On Monday 13 December 2010, Johan Corveleyn wrote: > I'm wondering if there is a (de-facto) standard way of "end-of-lifing" > projects in an SVN repository, or any suggestions for this from other > users on this list ... > > With End-Of-Life I mean there will be no further maintenance on that > pro

Re: Archiving Projects (End-Of-Life)

2010-12-13 Thread David Weintraub
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 3:04 PM, Johan Corveleyn wrote: > Hi, > > I'm wondering if there is a (de-facto) standard way of "end-of-lifing" > projects in an SVN repository, or any suggestions for this from other > users on this list ... >> > I know I could just "svn rm" them, but some of the "project

RE: Archiving Projects (End-Of-Life)

2010-12-13 Thread Bob Archer
> I'm wondering if there is a (de-facto) standard way of "end-of- > lifing" > projects in an SVN repository, or any suggestions for this from > other > users on this list ... > > With End-Of-Life I mean there will be no further maintenance on > that > project, no more development, no more releases