> From: Thomas Harold
> Sent: Friday, 23 August 2013 11:53 AM
> On 8/22/2013 7:11 PM, Geoff Field wrote:
> Most restores for us took about 5-10 minutes, a few of our
> larger repos took a few hours.
I was doing this all in the background via remote login to our SVN server, so I
didn't monitor ti
On 8/22/2013 7:11 PM, Geoff Field wrote:
6. Create the repository in svn 1.8.
I'm sure there's an "upgrade" command that would do it all in-place.
7. Strip permissions on the repository back down to 700, owned by
root:root while we reload the data.
While, or before?
Step 6 created the rep
Hi Thomas,
> From: Thomas Harold
> Sent: Friday, 23 August 2013 1:25 AM
> On 8/21/2013 7:13 PM, Geoff Field wrote:
> > I'm keeping the
> > original BDB repositories, with read-only permissions.
> > If I really have the need, I can restart Apache 2 with SVN
> > 1.2.3 and
> > go back to the origi
On 8/21/2013 7:13 PM, Geoff Field wrote:> I'm keeping the original BDB
repositories, with read-only permissions.
If I really have the need, I can restart Apache 2 with SVN 1.2.3 and
go back to the original repositories. Otherwise, I also have the
option of re-running my batch file (modifying it i
From: Nico Kadel-Garcia
Sent: Thursday, 22 August 2013 8:10 AM
I would never do a transfer like this without a copy of the dumpfile available,
for reference. The pain of having to re-run the dump later, especially if there
are any bugs in the "svnadmin load" conf
I would never do a transfer like this without a copy of the dumpfile
available, for reference. The pain of having to re-run the dump later,
especially if there are any bugs in the "svnadmin load" configuration,
normally justifies keeping the dump around until well after the migraiton
is completed.
> From: Thorsten Schöning
> Sent: Wednesday, 21 August 2013 17:21 PM
> Guten Tag Geoff Field,
> am Mittwoch, 21. August 2013 um 08:29 schrieben Sie:
>
> > I've just realised that my concern was based on a power-of-2
> > limitation that means that a 32-bit signed integer would
> roll over at
> >
Guten Tag Geoff Field,
am Mittwoch, 21. August 2013 um 08:29 schrieben Sie:
> I've just realised that my concern was based on a power-of-2
> limitation that means that a 32-bit signed integer would roll over
> at the 2GB mark, with an unsigned roll-over at 4GB. It's possible
> the Windows Server
> From: Ben Reser
> Sent: Wednesday, 21 August 2013 17:07 PM
>
> On 8/20/13 11:29 PM, Geoff Field wrote:
> > Note that we have the old version 1.2.3 server software installed at
> > the C:\Program Files\Subversion location, and later versions
> > are stored under other locations, with the path se
On 8/20/13 11:29 PM, Geoff Field wrote:
> Note that we have the old version 1.2.3 server software installed at
the C:\Program Files\Subversion location, and later versions are stored
under other locations, with the path set to point to the new version.
I'm creating the new repositories with the old
> From: Ben Reser
> Sent: Wednesday, 21 August 2013 12:12 PM
> On Tue Aug 20 16:44:08 2013, Geoff Field wrote:
> > I've seen some quite large dump files already - one got up
> > to about 28GB. The svnadmin 1.2.3 tool managed to cope with
> > that quite successfully. Right now, our largest repos
On Tue Aug 20 16:44:08 2013, Geoff Field wrote:
> I've seen some quite large dump files already - one got up to about 28GB.
> The svnadmin 1.2.3 tool managed to cope with that quite successfully. Right
> now, our largest repository (some 19,000 revisions with many files, including
> installati
12 matches
Mail list logo
