Re: Method not allowed exception

2013-11-14 Thread Ben Reser
On 11/14/13 2:07 AM, Stefano Fraccaro wrote: > while upgrading the subversion repository to version 1.8.4 the external > technician has also changed the folder name without notice. I lost many hours > because I haven't understood immediately that "method not allowed" means "url > not found" (in

Re: Method not allowed exception

2013-11-14 Thread Stefano Fraccaro
Il 14/11/2013 22:35, Ben Reser ha scritto: Can you elaborate what method you're seeing method not allowed with? Or if you were running a svn client what command you were running? TortoiseSVN > SVN Checkout The one case where we made such a change that comes to mind is with LOCK. LOCK per the

Re: Method not allowed exception

2013-11-14 Thread Branko Čibej
On 15.11.2013 07:47, Stefano Fraccaro wrote: > Il 14/11/2013 22:35, Ben Reser ha scritto: >> Can you elaborate what method you're seeing method not allowed with? >> Or if you >> were running a svn client what command you were running? > TortoiseSVN > SVN Checkout >> >> The one case where we made s

RE: Method not allowed exception

2013-11-17 Thread Geoff Field
ll and run the Wandisco binaries, but with our configuration it was easiest to get working by just doing the copy.) Regards, Geoff From: Branko Čibej Sent: Friday, 15 November 2013 18:09 PM To: users@subversion.apache.org Subject: Re: Method not allowed

Re: Method not allowed exception

2013-11-17 Thread Ben Reser
On 11/17/13 2:12 PM, Geoff Field wrote: > Sorry for top-posting, but although Brane is right, he's not being as helpful > as he could. > > Stefano, I had pretty much the same issue. A workaround is to only do > actions (other than Commit) on unlocked working copies. That is, before > doing a

RE: Method not allowed exception

2013-11-17 Thread Geoff Field
> From: Ben Reser > On 11/17/13 2:12 PM, Geoff Field wrote: > > Sorry for top-posting, but although Brane is right, he's > not being as helpful as he could. [snip] > Your issue and the one he is having aren't similar at all. > > He was trying to do a checkout against a URL that isn't > directed