I was under the impression that subversion now automatically takes subtree
mergeinfo into account:
http://svnbook.red-bean.com/nightly/en/svn.branchmerge.basicmerging.html#svn.branchmerge.basicmerging.stayinsync.subtree
-Original Message-
From: Stefan Hett [mailto:ste...@egosoft.com]
It does and that's not quite the problem for me. However what's possible
to do with SVN are merges like these:
merge A/B/somefile into A
absolutely valid operation, but nothing we use here. In cases this is
done here in our company it's always an incorrect merge (because someone
chose the wro
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 7:03 PM, Stefan Hett wrote:
> It does and that's not quite the problem for me. However what's possible
> to do with SVN are merges like these:
>
> merge A/B/somefile into A
>
> absolutely valid operation, but nothing we use here. In cases this is done
> here in our co
Stefan Hett wrote on Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 19:03:08 +0200:
> It does and that's not quite the problem for me. However what's
> possible to do with SVN are merges like these:
>
> merge A/B/somefile into A
That surprises me. We have a similar validation for 'switch' that
enforces the source and tar
