> From: Stefan Sperling [mailto:s...@elego.de]
>
> By design, the handling of checksums is sane.
> Checksums are stored in the repository, and are calculated by the
repository
> layer. A client can only tell the repository what it expects the checksum
to be.
> When the client sends content, the re
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 03:10:19PM +0200, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Stefan Sperling wrote on Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 13:29:14 +0100:
> > I'm not sure what svnadmin verify is doing wrong in your case.
> > But I know that there are corruptions it doesn't detect, and we're
> > planning to improve this situa
Stefan Sperling wrote on Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 13:29:14 +0100:
> I'm not sure what svnadmin verify is doing wrong in your case.
> But I know that there are corruptions it doesn't detect, and we're
> planning to improve this situation:
> http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3706
What'
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 08:55:49PM -0500, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
> > From: Stefan Sperling [mailto:s...@elego.de]
> >
> > > It's 100% consistent. I get the same checksum error, on the same file,
> > every time. I have a supposed "good" copy of the slave repo, at rev
> 4050...
> > which will fa
> From: Stefan Sperling [mailto:s...@elego.de]
>
> > It's 100% consistent. I get the same checksum error, on the same file,
> every time. I have a supposed "good" copy of the slave repo, at rev
4050...
> which will fail every time at 4061 (or something like that)... The only
> explanation I can
On Sun, Nov 07, 2010 at 12:48:01PM -0500, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
> I do think it's a bug, but I was never able to find enough info to make it
> into a bug report. I kept all the good & bad versions of the repository...
> I ran the "svnadmin verify" all over the place (which is enormously tim
On 11/10/2010 1:39 PM, opensrcguru wrote:
Correct. A new/fresh resync from r0 (including the previously troubled
revision) to latest completes successfully with no errors. That
process was the last in my troubleshooting process and is how I worked
around the problem.
--
In my case, I do no
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 10:49 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> OSG wrote on Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 20:58:53 -0600:
>> On 11/09/2010 06:41 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>> > Edward Ned Harvey wrote on Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 20:29:18 -0400:
>> >>> From: opensrcguru [mailto:opensrcg...@gmail.com]
>> >>>
>> >>> Toda
Edward Ned Harvey wrote on Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 00:28:48 -0500:
> > From: Daniel Shahaf [mailto:d...@daniel.shahaf.name]
> >
> > Can you compare the contents of /path/to/file/foo/bar between the master
> > and mirror, as of the last revision successfully synced to the mirror?
>
> The latest rev w
OSG wrote on Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 20:58:53 -0600:
> On 11/09/2010 06:41 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > Edward Ned Harvey wrote on Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 20:29:18 -0400:
> >>> From: opensrcguru [mailto:opensrcg...@gmail.com]
> >>>
> >>> Today, the sync process started failing on 1 repo (all others were
> From: Daniel Shahaf [mailto:d...@daniel.shahaf.name]
>
> Can you compare the contents of /path/to/file/foo/bar between the master
> and mirror, as of the last revision successfully synced to the mirror?
The latest rev which synced without reporting any error was 5045. It was
trying to go from
On 11/09/2010 06:41 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Edward Ned Harvey wrote on Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 20:29:18 -0400:
>>> From: opensrcguru [mailto:opensrcg...@gmail.com]
>>>
>>> Today, the sync process started failing on 1 repo (all others were
>>> unaffected) on both r/o copies at the exact same time/sa
On 11/5/10 8:26 AM, opensrcguru wrote:
List,
I've got about 20 repos that have been successfully syncing (with
svnsync) to two read only copies for a few months. The r/w copy and
both r/o copies are located on a local LAN (different subnets
separated by firewalls).
Today, the sync process start
Edward Ned Harvey wrote on Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 20:29:18 -0400:
> > From: opensrcguru [mailto:opensrcg...@gmail.com]
> >
> > Today, the sync process started failing on 1 repo (all others were
> > unaffected) on both r/o copies at the exact same time/same revision
> > with errors similar to the fol
> -Original Message-
> From: Terry Inzauro [mailto:opensrcg...@gmail.com]
>
> I've found a handful of other cases similar to ours. Do you think a bug report
> is warranted or is this unique to our configurations?
I do think it's a bug, but I was never able to find enough info to make it
> From: opensrcguru [mailto:opensrcg...@gmail.com]
>
> Today, the sync process started failing on 1 repo (all others were
> unaffected) on both r/o copies at the exact same time/same revision
> with errors similar to the following...
>
> Transmitting file data .svnsync: Base checksum mismatch on
On 11/06/2010 07:29 PM, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
>> From: opensrcguru [mailto:opensrcg...@gmail.com]
>>
>> Today, the sync process started failing on 1 repo (all others were
>> unaffected) on both r/o copies at the exact same time/same revision
>> with errors similar to the following...
>>
>> Trans
17 matches
Mail list logo
