Re: Subversion update "bug" ?

2010-04-26 Thread Andy Levy
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 16:34, Phil Pinkerton wrote: > svn 1.6.5  while in a working copy I modified a file for testing. > After testing I wanted to update the file I modified in the working copy to > the version in the repository. > > the resulting update did not replace the files in the working

Re: Subversion update "bug" ?

2010-04-26 Thread Stanimir Stamenkov
Mon, 26 Apr 2010 16:34:28 -0400, /Phil Pinkerton/: svn 1.6.5 while in a working copy I modified a file for testing. After testing I wanted to update the file I modified in the working copy to the version in the repository. the resulting update did not replace the files in the working copy as

Re: Subversion update "bug" ?

2010-04-26 Thread Itamar O
Hi Phil, This is standard Subversion usage according to the Copy-Modify-Merge model. Read in the SVN book for further details: http://svnbook.red-bean.com/nightly/en/svn.basic.vsn-models.html#svn.basic.vsn-models.copy-merge Bottom line, if you want to undo local changes, you need to use svn rever

Subversion update "bug" ?

2010-04-26 Thread Phil Pinkerton
svn 1.6.5 while in a working copy I modified a file for testing. After testing I wanted to update the file I modified in the working copy to the version in the repository. the resulting update did not replace the files in the working copy as expected the modified file still remains. the only way