I am asked to implement a repository system for a client. When looking
at the version, I see:
svnserve, version 1.5.1 (r32289)
compiled Mar 1 2011, 17:20:34
I find this a bit strange. Only three weeks ago compiled, but still on
1.5.1. Should I ask them to upgrade, or is that not very i
On Mar 21, 2011, at 11:14, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
> I am asked to implement a repository system for a client. When looking
> at the version, I see:
>svnserve, version 1.5.1 (r32289)
> compiled Mar 1 2011, 17:20:34
>
> I find this a bit strange. Only three weeks ago compiled, but still
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 12:14, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
> I am asked to implement a repository system for a client. When looking
> at the version, I see:
> svnserve, version 1.5.1 (r32289)
> compiled Mar 1 2011, 17:20:34
>
> I find this a bit strange. Only three weeks ago compiled, but sti
Op maandag 21 mrt 2011 17:20 CET schreef Andy Levy:
>> I am asked to implement a repository system for a client. When looking
>> at the version, I see:
>> svnserve, version 1.5.1 (r32289)
>> compiled Mar 1 2011, 17:20:34
>>
>> I find this a bit strange. Only three weeks ago compiled, but
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 12:14 PM, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
> I am asked to implement a repository system for a client. When looking
> at the version, I see:
> svnserve, version 1.5.1 (r32289)
> compiled Mar 1 2011, 17:20:34
>
> I find this a bit strange. Only three weeks ago compiled, but
[mailto:ce...@decebal.nl]
> Sent: 21 March 2011 16:15
> To: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Upgrade subversion 1.5.1
>
> I am asked to implement a repository system for a client.
> When looking at the version, I see:
> svnserve, version 1.5.1 (r32289)
>compile
Op maandag 21 mrt 2011 17:18 CET schreef Ryan Schmidt:
>> I am asked to implement a repository system for a client. When looking
>> at the version, I see:
>> svnserve, version 1.5.1 (r32289)
>> compiled Mar 1 2011, 17:20:34
>>
>> I find this a bit strange. Only three weeks ago compiled, but stil
