Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
$ export `gnome-keyring-daemon`
Good, but ouch. Let's try adding a bit of rigor, shall we? First,
before running such a daemon, always check that it actually exists,
where you expect it to exist. Running random commands that will handle
passwords which may have
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 10:22:42PM -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 9:12 AM, Stefan Sperling s...@elego.de wrote:
Fortunately, today, we have support for KDE Wallet and Gnome Keyring.
So you can set up a secure password cache on *nix, if you have KDE
or Gnome, at
On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 5:23 AM, Stefan Sperling s...@elego.de wrote:
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 10:22:42PM -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 9:12 AM, Stefan Sperling s...@elego.de wrote:
Fortunately, today, we have support for KDE Wallet and Gnome Keyring.
So you can set
On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 12:59 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia nka...@gmail.com wrote:
AFAIK it's possible to run gnome-keyring without X.
It's painful. Take a glance at
http://superuser.com/questions/141036/use-of-gnome-keyring-daemon-without-x,
which documents manually editing /etc/pam.d/ login
On Sun, Aug 01, 2010 at 12:59:08PM -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
I've given a few specific examples. While it's gotten better and
you've addressed some of my concerns, my overall concerns still stand.
Cleartext password storage is a big problem, frequently ignored by
deployers and
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 11:55 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia nka...@gmail.com wrote:
No, it's harsh experience since version 1.2 (when I started helping
rebuild it and rebundle it for Dag's RPM repository, now RPMfoge). The
UNIX/Linux clients should *never* have been permitted to store
passwords.
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 11:55:20PM -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
No, it's harsh experience since version 1.2 (when I started helping
rebuild it and rebundle it for Dag's RPM repository, now RPMfoge). The
UNIX/Linux clients should *never* have been permitted to store
passwords.
You forgot in
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 08:18:37AM -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
And by the way: my spelling is not usually as bad as this note was. My
RSI is flaring up, probably my own fault.
I feel your pain, I get that, too.
Cycling regularly and the gym helps an awful lot.
You need to get your blood
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 9:12 AM, Stefan Sperling s...@elego.de wrote:
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 11:55:20PM -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
No, it's harsh experience since version 1.2 (when I started helping
rebuild it and rebundle it for Dag's RPM repository, now RPMfoge). The
UNIX/Linux clients
-Original Message-
From: Nils Wilhelm [mailto:mur...@planet-of-art.de]
Sent: 30 July 2010 00:58
To: users@subversion.apache.org
Subject: Re: svnserv + ssh + ldap
Hi there,
this is in addition to my last post:
If i use
- svn:// protocol everything will be sent in plain text
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 07:56, Nico Kadel-Garcia nka...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 8:51 AM, Nils Wilhelm mur...@planet-of-art.de wrote:
Hi there,
i need your help getting an overview and configuring a subversion server.
What i have to do is setting up a subversion server using
Hi there,
Stefan Sperling wrote:
If I understood correctly, the question was about using Subversion
with SSH and LDAP.
You're right.
i have installed the server by using this tutorial
http://jimmyg.org/blog/2007/subversion-over-svnssh-on-debian.html
So what i have now is a subversion
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 04:20:14PM +0200, Nils Wilhelm wrote:
Hi there,
Stefan Sperling wrote:
If I understood correctly, the question was about using Subversion
with SSH and LDAP.
You're right.
i have installed the server by using this tutorial
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 8:49 AM, Stefan Sperling s...@elego.de wrote:
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 07:56:50AM -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
Don't use LDAP. One problem is that it will allow multiple users
filesystem access to the Subversion repository, and *SOMEONE* is
likely to screw it up for
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 12:17:50PM -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 8:49 AM, Stefan Sperling s...@elego.de wrote:
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 07:56:50AM -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
Don't use LDAP. One problem is that it will allow multiple users
filesystem access to
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 1:19 PM, Stefan Sperling s...@elego.de wrote:
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 12:17:50PM -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 8:49 AM, Stefan Sperling s...@elego.de wrote:
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 07:56:50AM -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
Don't use LDAP.
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 05:51:42PM -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
It's the integration of LDAP authentication the interferes
with restricting the ssh+svn access to strictly ssh+svn, and allows
access to the filesystem of the Subversion server via ssh, scp, and
possibly sftp.
I see. Well, if
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 6:50 PM, Stefan Sperling s...@elego.de wrote:
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 05:51:42PM -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
It's the integration of LDAP authentication the interferes
with restricting the ssh+svn access to strictly ssh+svn, and allows
access to the filesystem of
Hi there,
i need your help getting an overview and configuring a subversion
server. What i have to do is setting up a subversion server using ldap
and ssh. After reading some theory about it i'm totally confused :-) So
i hope you can help me with that.
What i have: A suse server with a
Hi there,
this is in addition to my last post:
If i use
- svn:// protocol everything will be sent in plain text so this will
have security issues - not usable for me
- svn+ssh:// protocol i need an account on the server for every person
for two reasons: The authentication using ssh and to
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 01:57:53AM +0200, Nils Wilhelm wrote:
Hi there,
this is in addition to my last post:
If i use
- svn:// protocol everything will be sent in plain text so this will
have security issues - not usable for me
- svn+ssh:// protocol i need an account on the server for
21 matches
Mail list logo
