Re: wc.db: corruption after move?

2013-11-27 Thread Marc Strapetz
On 26.11.2013 21:38, Philip Martin wrote: Marc Strapetz marc.strap...@syntevo.com writes: As far as I have been told, this has already been fixed and backported to 1.8.5. Still, for those users which already have this corruption, is there a way to recover their working copies with standard

RE: wc.db: corruption after move?

2013-11-27 Thread Bert Huijben
-Original Message- From: Marc Strapetz [mailto:marc.strap...@syntevo.com] Sent: woensdag 27 november 2013 09:30 To: Philip Martin Cc: Branko Čibej; users@subversion.apache.org Subject: Re: wc.db: corruption after move? On 26.11.2013 21:38, Philip Martin wrote: Marc Strapetz

Re: wc.db: corruption after move?

2013-11-27 Thread Marc Strapetz
On 27.11.2013 11:32, Bert Huijben wrote: -Original Message- From: Marc Strapetz [mailto:marc.strap...@syntevo.com] Sent: woensdag 27 november 2013 09:30 To: Philip Martin Cc: Branko Čibej; users@subversion.apache.org Subject: Re: wc.db: corruption after move? On 26.11.2013 21

wc.db: corruption after move?

2013-11-26 Thread Marc Strapetz
We are encountering working copies with nodes.presence = moved and nodes.moved_to = null As far as I have been told, this has already been fixed and backported to 1.8.5. Still, for those users which already have this corruption, is there a way to recover their working copies with standard

Re: wc.db: corruption after move?

2013-11-26 Thread Philip Martin
Marc Strapetz marc.strap...@syntevo.com writes: We are encountering working copies with nodes.presence = moved and nodes.moved_to = null What does nodes.presence = moved mean? There has never been a moved presence. Do you mean rows with nodes.moved_here=1 no corresponding rows with non-null

Re: wc.db: corruption after move?

2013-11-26 Thread Branko Čibej
On 26.11.2013 18:08, Philip Martin wrote: Marc Strapetz marc.strap...@syntevo.com writes: We are encountering working copies with nodes.presence = moved and nodes.moved_to = null What does nodes.presence = moved mean? There has never been a moved presence. Do you mean rows with

Re: wc.db: corruption after move?

2013-11-26 Thread Branko Čibej
On 26.11.2013 18:27, Branko Čibej wrote: On 26.11.2013 18:08, Philip Martin wrote: Marc Strapetz marc.strap...@syntevo.com writes: We are encountering working copies with nodes.presence = moved and nodes.moved_to = null What does nodes.presence = moved mean? There has never been a moved

Re: wc.db: corruption after move?

2013-11-26 Thread Marc Strapetz
On 26.11.2013 18:27, Branko Čibej wrote: On 26.11.2013 18:08, Philip Martin wrote: Marc Strapetz marc.strap...@syntevo.com writes: We are encountering working copies with nodes.presence = moved and nodes.moved_to = null What does nodes.presence = moved mean? There has never been a moved

Re: wc.db: corruption after move?

2013-11-26 Thread Philip Martin
Marc Strapetz marc.strap...@syntevo.com writes: As far as I have been told, this has already been fixed and backported to 1.8.5. Still, for those users which already have this corruption, is there a way to recover their working copies with standard Subversion functionality? Could a Revert