Hello Thiago,
sorry, the weekend happened to come in between. ;-)
> What value are you passing to the context field of
> LinkFactory.createComponentEventLink()?
> AFAIK, Tapestry always adds the current activation context to any links,
> unless you specify
> an activation context yourself. Try
I would like to discard all changes for one strategy only.
PersistentFieldManager always iterates over all strategies when calling
discardChanges() and I don't see any (easy) way to decorate the
PersistentFieldManager to allow it to discard selectively for some
strategies only. Would it be possible
Aaron, I was able to reproduce your fast/slow problem using every Tap
version from 4.1.1 up
to 4.1.6 (and relevent ognl versions) but only when
org.apache.tapestry.disable-caching was set to TRUE
Perhaps you forgot to set this property back to false ?
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 7:46 PM, Aaron Kamin
Seems reasonable to me; the TypeCoercer is coercing Float to Integer
and checking for zero, and that's a lossy coercion that rounds down.
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 12:59 AM, James Hillyerd wrote:
> It seems that t:if considers 0.1, 0.99 as false, but 1.0 as true.
> Should I file a bug? This i
I had some problems with deploying my project and reading properties with
this example (developed on Jetty - OK!, but deployed on Tomcat, and reading
properties failed).
Solution was in Tapestry source code:
InputStream in =
Thread.currentThread().getContextClassLoader().getResourceAsStream(re
Hi James,
I don't think it is an issue with the if-component. If-component just
calls a method that is given in the test-attribute and evaluates whether
it returns true or false. Could it be that in this method you
accidencially do an Integer comparison instead of a Float comparison?
Greetz nilleha
I completely agree too. A search facility of the existing site would
be a huge leap forward.
On 16/01/2009, at 9:23 AM, Szemere Szemere wrote:
Completely agree with the sentiments expressed. Too often I've had
to use
Google or similar to find what I'm looking for in the Tapestry
documentati
I would prefer a prototypical community application to start the usual
webapp.
So user management, registration with email validation and capchas,
profiles, user groups, fine grained security, optionally simplistic blogs,
forums, pm's and a bit of content management etc. I tend to copy that stuff
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 6:36 PM, Martijn Brinkers
wrote:
> But I'm using run-jetty-run successfully for a long time already. I only
> had to add -Dorg.mortbay.jetty.webapp.parentLoaderPriority=true to the
> VM-arguments box in the run-jetty-run debug configuration (in Eclipse)
It still doesn't wo
For the record, I've succeeded in getting Jetty-T5-OpenEJB-Hibernate
working. It's a great combination for development and it has resulted
in JumpStart 4.0. I'll post the announcement tomorrow if there are no
glitches reported in the next 24 hours.
On 22/11/2008, at 10:35 AM, Geoff Callen
Hi Kalle,
I can't recommend for, or against, jSecurity because back in April it
didn't quite fit my needs (http://www.jsecurity.org/node/1031).
However, I do think they're on the right track. Since then (April)
they've gone into the Apache incubator. I intend to review it again
soon.
It seems that t:if considers 0.1, 0.99 as false, but 1.0 as true.
Should I file a bug? This is 5.0.18
-james
--
James A. Hillyerd
12 matches
Mail list logo