There is a PropertyAccess service that is based on reflection, and a
PropertyConduit service that uses the property expression language (it
generates new classes, bypassing reflection).
On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 3:44 PM, Alejandro Scandroli <
ascandr...@codehaus.org> wrote:
> Hi All
>
> Is there a
Hi All
Is there a replacement for T4 PropertyUtils? Does T5 have any
alternative to PropertyUtils?
Thanks in advance.
Alejandro.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: u
> You're right. Maybe we should change the default tracker persistence from
> session to flash persistence? I do that in my projects using @Meta.
Personally I wish the form didn't persist anything until it needed it
so the session wasn't created. Client persistence isn't an option
because of the n
Ivano Luberti schrieb:
Hi Sebastian here is my report after a quick trip through the web site:
I will skip compliments and thanks for the effort :-D
I don't like the long empty space under the word Thanks in the first
left menu
If we don't use a fixed size for the menu, the whole menu will move
Hi Igor, I bought the PDF Book today and started reading immediately,
very well written so far looks very promising!
But where can I get the content (examples) that will be delivered on CD
with the printed version?
thx, Max
Am 16.09.2009 um 20:28 schrieb Igor Drobiazko:
Hello folks,
I am pl
Em Fri, 18 Sep 2009 19:57:41 -0300, Josh Canfield
escreveu:
Last time I checked the Form component persists the tracker, which
means rendering a form puts something in your session. Every page in
the test has a form and so a different tracker would be persisted.
You're right. Maybe we shoul
Not by now, I use the solution that is on the wiki-howto, it's just
using eclipse wtp, and select a specific DTD that autocompletes
standard components (t:loop, etc) but you can add your own components
definitions and it will autocomplete your own components. And more,
you can develop a simple tool
