Just to add my two cents.
My tapestry applications have been in production for a long time (7+ years) and
are rock solid and highly scalable. I think Tapestry is still a very good
solution for many use cases.
Thanks
Taha
> On 28 Nov 2018, at 00:26, Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
> wrote:
>
I’m finding resources are not dynamically reloading. Jetty config below, what
do I need to do?
org.eclipse.jetty
jetty-maven-plugin
9.2.0.M0
About client and server separation, I meant that the application should
be split into one server/back-end part providing a rest interface and a
web application part which can use a completely different framework like
Angular. That way no dependencies exist between the two which helps a
lot duri
On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 11:39 AM Mats Andersson
wrote:
> I have been using Tapestry in different setups since the beginning of
> Tapestry 5. First I found the IOC and the client components useful.
In my day job, which uses Tapestry, even the people who dislike
Tapestry-the-web-framework actuall
It is true, he has mentioned that in the first line. But what is the point
of creating something and not using it? As a new user, that would sound and
alarm bell to me.
On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 3:16 PM Numa Schmeder wrote:
> Yes and on the first lines it’s written creator of Tapestry Framework ;)
Does anyone has experience building an angular or react application consisting
on interacting with more than 100 related objects containing all at least 10
fields of different types (string, double, int, dates, times) etc.
I am interested on your feedback.
I have worked on smaller react/redux p
Yes and on the first lines it’s written creator of Tapestry Framework ;)
> Le 27 nov. 2018 à 13:36, Emmanuel Sowah a écrit :
>
> Hi,
>
> Here is a snippet from skills Howard Lewis Ship's listed on his website
> http://howardlewisship.com/:
>
> "*On the front-end, I've used all the major fram
Tapestry does a lot of things. It is not easy to cover every aspect with a
good/bad old/new style talking about Tapestry as one thing. Opinions from the
ones actually using it could be useful for anyone reading this list, so here is
my contribution to that.
I have been using Tapestry in differ
Hi,
Here is a snippet from skills Howard Lewis Ship's listed on his website
http://howardlewisship.com/:
"*On the front-end, I've used all the major frameworks: jQuery, AngularJS,
Backbone, ReactJS, ExtJS, Underscore, and more. More importantly, I have
leveraged whatever tools are available to cr
Guys,
Get out of the stone-age page based server-side frameworks like Tapestry.
The world is moving on. Even Howard Lewis Ship dumped this bloated
old-fashioned thing and moved on. Don't be left behind.
Grab Angular today. It has a learning curve of course. But it would all be
worth it in the long
I think Tapestry is super for small to medium projects. Tapestry has bundled
JQuery, datatable, boostrap, underscore etc. It comes with a lot of nice usable
Tapestry components. Tapestry takes care of making everything working together,
but you can use your own version of e.g. JQuery if you want
On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 7:54 AM Rafael Bugajewski
wrote:
> Heya all,
>
Hello!
> I’m in a similar situation. I started my first Tapestry project 14 months
> ago and did a pretty sophisticated research in advance. I haven’t regretted
> it yet, and the only worries I had, were about new Java rele
On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 6:13 PM Emmanuel Sowah wrote:
> Thiago,
>
> It seems you cannot read English.
I do
> I was suggesting Angular and Spring
> backend services being exposed via Rest to the Angular.
Yes, just after you had just suggested Angular and nothing else.
> It's seems all you
Hi everyone,
I am using tapestry since 10 years, on web apps that have 100’000+ lines of
codes. It works well, of course it has it’s drawbacks like any framework, but
it’s way better than many other frameworks I have tested (JSF, Wicket, Struts,
Spring MVC).
Building apps with 100% of react is
Heya all,
I’m in a similar situation. I started my first Tapestry project 14 months ago
and did a pretty sophisticated research in advance. I haven’t regretted it yet,
and the only worries I had, were about new Java releases compatibility. But
this is something that is already in progress as fa
15 matches
Mail list logo
