+1 ;)
2009/11/11 Antonio Fernández amiguel.fernan...@gmail.com
+1
Alfonso Quiroga escribió:
+1
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 6:24 PM, keykubat sahinfati...@gmail.com wrote:
:) +1
Igor Drobiazko wrote:
Good news. My publisher made the first step towards the translation.
They
James Sherwood wrote:
Hello,
I have the reverse engineering working correctly but I wish to modify it a
bit.
Tapestry requires and @Validate(required) annotation in front of the
variables of the class that are required for global validation. (Unless
there is a way to do global validation
Yes, we are really waiting for it !!
Thanks
Hugo Palma wrote:
Hi again Toby,
please don't forget to add your code to the wiki.
Thanks again.
Toby Hobson wrote:
I have written a component based on treemenu. I'll happily send you
the code but it comes with no warranty!!
Toby
-
Or, you can use the new @PageActivationContext annotation for a greater
simplicity
Zanius
Ted Steen wrote:
Just add more parameters to the activate/passivate-methods.
Or you can use (Object[] parameters).
Or you can use (EventContext context)
The way to go for you would be to just add more
why don't ?
Ted Steen wrote:
I dont think you can use that with multiple values as the context :/
2008/7/9 Francisco Manzano [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Or, you can use the new @PageActivationContext annotation for a greater
simplicity
Zanius
Ted Steen wrote:
Just add more parameters
/9 Francisco Manzano [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
why don't ?
Ted Steen wrote:
I dont think you can use that with multiple values as the context :/
2008/7/9 Francisco Manzano [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Or, you can use the new @PageActivationContext annotation for a greater
simplicity
Zanius
Hi, I am inexperienced in Tapestry, but I had east problem recently:
You have like result a valid xhtml page? You can look for if you have
scripts of tapestry inserted at the end of the page.
something like this :
...
script src=../../assets/scriptaculous/5.0.13/prototype.js