.
>
> Jonathan
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Filip S. Adamsen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 12:20
> > To: Tapestry users
> > Subject: Re: AW: T5: ApplicationStateObject is misleading
> >
> > There
se I started with T3, so
it's just the evolution of the Visit object.
Jonathan
> -Original Message-
> From: Filip S. Adamsen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 12:20
> To: Tapestry users
> Subject: Re: AW: T5: ApplicationStateObject is m
There are still dozens of Tapestry services that will need to be
changed/rewritten, though. I'm not against this, just saying it's a huge
change at this point - the way I see it, anyway.
-Filip
On 2008-09-17 18:12, Hilco Wijbenga wrote:
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 09:03, Filip S. Adamsen <[EMAIL
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 09:03, Filip S. Adamsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> @Scope does, indeed, make more sense than @Persist and
> @ApplicationStateObject. I wouldn't mind that change, but is it feasible at
> this point in Tapestry 5's development cycle?
Sure, just deprecate @Persist and @Appli
@Scope does, indeed, make more sense than @Persist and
@ApplicationStateObject. I wouldn't mind that change, but is it feasible
at this point in Tapestry 5's development cycle?
-Filip
On 2008-09-17 17:36, Geoff Callender wrote:
Exactly. To everyone who thinks @ApplicationState is not a mislea
sage -
From: "Maximilian Weißböck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tapestry users"
Sent: Wednesday, 17 September, 2008 5:52:26 PM GMT +02:00 Athens,
Beirut, Bucharest, Istanbul
Subject: AW: T5: ApplicationStateObject is misleading
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Kri
- Original Message -
From: "Maximilian Weißböck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tapestry users"
Sent: Wednesday, 17 September, 2008 5:52:26 PM GMT +02:00 Athens, Beirut,
Bucharest, Istanbul
Subject: AW: T5: ApplicationStateObject is misleading
> -Ursprüngliche N
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Kristian Marinkovic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 16. September 2008 15:19
> An: Tapestry users
> Betreff: Re: T5: ApplicationStateObject is misleading
>
>
> I'm no native speaker but ApplicationStateObject is quite fine for
> me..
