Re: ActionLink not Search Engine safe?

2011-08-08 Thread Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
On Mon, 01 Aug 2011 14:15:43 -0300, PXZ wrote: I have found a solution by making a custom link component in this way: Merge the sourcecode of the following classes: AbstractLink, AbstractComponentEventLink and ActionLink. Then modify the buildHref() method so that it simply returns "#". Then yo

Re: ActionLink not Search Engine safe?

2011-08-01 Thread PXZ
ead of the core ActionLink. -- View this message in context: http://tapestry.1045711.n5.nabble.com/ActionLink-not-Search-Engine-safe-tp4490777p4655695.html Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsu

Re: ActionLink not Search Engine safe?

2011-07-31 Thread PXZ
the href writing element, but Tapestry seems to shield developers from extending its components by making the writeLink method (in AbstractLink) final. -- View this message in context: http://tapestry.1045711.n5.nabble.com/ActionLink-not-Search-Engine-safe-tp4490777p4653448.html Sent from th

Re: ActionLink not Search Engine safe?

2011-07-31 Thread Taha Hafeez
? (I have searched for whether it > supports ajax, but couldn't find it.) > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://tapestry.1045711.n5.nabble.com/ActionLink-not-Search-Engine-safe-tp4490777p4652006.html > Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at N

Re: ActionLink not Search Engine safe?

2011-07-31 Thread PXZ
/ref/org/apache/tapestry5/corelib/components/LinkSubmit.html Thanks for the info. Is a LinkSubmit able to perform ajax calls? (I have searched for whether it supports ajax, but couldn't find it.) -- View this message in context: http://tapestry.1045711.n5.nabble.com/ActionLink-not-Search-Engine

Re: ActionLink not Search Engine safe?

2011-07-31 Thread Taha Hafeez
nk action should be available for publicly > non-authenticated users? For example a blogging website where everybody can > post comments. Than actionlinks cannot be used. > > There no easy solution in Tapestry to solve this :( > > -- > View this message in context: > http:

Re: ActionLink not Search Engine safe?

2011-07-31 Thread dragan.sahpas...@gmail.com
> There no easy solution in Tapestry to solve this :( > > -- > View this message in context: > http://tapestry.1045711.n5.nabble.com/ActionLink-not-Search-Engine-safe-tp4490777p4651671.html > Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > -

Re: ActionLink not Search Engine safe?

2011-07-31 Thread PXZ
g website where everybody can post comments. Than actionlinks cannot be used. There no easy solution in Tapestry to solve this :( -- View this message in context: http://tapestry.1045711.n5.nabble.com/ActionLink-not-Search-Engine-safe-tp4490777p4651671.html Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list a

Re: ActionLink not Search Engine safe?

2011-06-15 Thread Taha Tapestry
A link can be used for updates. As a developer it is our responsibility to ensure that such a link is only available to properly authenticated users. Regards Taha Sent from my iPhone On Jun 15, 2011, at 5:24 PM, "Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo" wrote: > On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 07:35:14 -0300, PXZ

Re: ActionLink not Search Engine safe?

2011-06-15 Thread Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 07:35:14 -0300, PXZ wrote: hi, I'm new to Tapestry. Welcome! I was trying out the Vote Youtube tutorial/video, and looks like that ActionLink doesn't seem to be safe for search engines? The problem with this code is that the link changes server sided database state

ActionLink not Search Engine safe?

2011-06-15 Thread PXZ
non-javascript clients. Is there a way to override the href attribute to "#" so that it is safe for search engines? Or is their another Tapestry component that is better suited for this problem? -- View this message in context: http://tapestry.1045711.n5.nabble.com/ActionLi