further invocations.
>
Thanks for the suggestion. That should work.
Carlos
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/OGNL-Expression-evaluated-4-times-on-tap-4.1.2-release-tf4824162.html#a13850119
Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing lis
Yep, it is on purpose - but I think that Jesse has said that it's
supposed to
go away eventually...
On the meantime, maybe the @Cached annotation can help you.
http://tacos.sourceforge.net/tacos4.1/tacos-annotations/index.html
It's in the 4.1.1-SNAPSHOT and it annotates a normal non-abstract met
tap 4.0.x.
Carlos
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/OGNL-Expression-evaluated-4-times-on-tap-4.1.2-release-tf4824162.html#a13844431
Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Carlos
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/OGNL-Expression-evaluated-4-times-on-tap-4.1.2-release-tf4824162.html#a13837518
> Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
>
BUMP . . . just trying to make sure this didn't get lost in all the T5
messages over the weekend .
Does anyone know what I can do to eliminate the duplicate calls?
Thanks in advance.
Carlos
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/OGNL-Expression-evaluated-4-times-on-tap-
g these OGNL expressions 4 times?
Carlos
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/OGNL-Expression-evaluated-4-times-on-tap-4.1.2-release-tf4824162.html#a13802424
Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
