+1
2008/8/18 Hugo Palma [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+1
T5 is all about making things easy. I would say that having an equivalent
to $content$ would be a step in the right direction.
Maybe issue TAPESTRY-1710 should be reopened ?
Onno Scheffers wrote:
+1
Having $content$ is much better IMHO.
+1
T5 is all about making things easy. I would say that having an
equivalent to $content$ would be a step in the right direction.
Maybe issue TAPESTRY-1710 should be reopened ?
Onno Scheffers wrote:
+1
Having $content$ is much better IMHO. I'm using the other approach currently
as a
Ivan,
thank you for offering your suggestion, indeed the solution you propose
for this particular case is straightforward enough and solves the problem.
I guess the reason that I was bringing this up for consideration (despite
it being discussed in the past), is that the lack of $content$
Alex Kotchnev wrote:
I also found this solution :
http://www.nabble.com/Re-%3A-Re-%3A-T5%3A-Layout-question-to16448904.html#a16448904,
but life just becomes a little uglier with it. I see that we're
jumping
through these hoops to prevent template previewability and so if it becomes
too much of
