Do you see any future initiative to have this?
--Matt
-Original Message-
From: James Carman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2006 3:58 PM
To: 'Tapestry users'
Subject: RE: Any news on Tap 4.1?
No, Spring beans are not real HiveMind services
, 2006 3:57 PM
To: Tapestry users
Subject: RE: Any news on Tap 4.1?
Just curious, when this is combined with the spring
plugin(tapestry-spring.jar), do components from spring get autowired as
well?
Thanks,
Matt
-Original Message-
From: James Carman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursda
From: Payne, Matthew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2006 3:57 PM
To: Tapestry users
Subject: RE: Any news on Tap 4.1?
Just curious, when this is combined with the spring
plugin(tapestry-spring.jar), do components from spring get autowired as
well?
Thanks,
Matt
-Original Messag
No, Spring beans are not real HiveMind services by default.
-Original Message-
From: Payne, Matthew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2006 3:57 PM
To: Tapestry users
Subject: RE: Any news on Tap 4.1?
Just curious, when this is combined with the spring
plugin(tapestry
7;
Subject: RE: Any news on Tap 4.1?
Components can be autowired too! :-)
-Original Message-
From: Martin Strand [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2006 3:21 PM
To: Tapestry users
Subject: Re: Any news on Tap 4.1?
I just changed to 4.1 in pom.xml and everything s
Components can be autowired too! :-)
-Original Message-
From: Martin Strand [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2006 3:21 PM
To: Tapestry users
Subject: Re: Any news on Tap 4.1?
I just changed to 4.1 in pom.xml and everything still works. :)
Nice to see autowiring for
I just changed to 4.1 in pom.xml and everything still works. :)
Nice to see autowiring for page classes.
Martin
On Thu, 27 Jul 2006 19:45:20 +0200, Jesse Kuhnert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Yeah, I had intended to release it Wednesday but I found too many places
that needed a lot more docume
Yeah, I had intended to release it Wednesday but I found too many places
that needed a lot more documentation so it didn't come to pass.
Most of the code is about as stable as it can be until we get more
feedback/people using it. I'll probably end up making the "official" release
Friday, but it w
Didn't someone announce a couple of weeks ago that it would be done "in a
couple of weeks?"
Thats why I'm asking today, I thought the date would be near.
On 7/27/06, Spencer Crissman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
No one who is involved in the voting process can estimate how stable the
current buil
No one who is involved in the voting process can estimate how stable the
current build is, just approximately, any closer than that?
We are in a similar boat, and would love to have just some kind of ballpark
guess, like, "all features are in and it is mostly stable - maybe a few
weeks" vs. "feat
I believe a new model is being used now. 4.1 releases will be made and
eventually one will be voted stable. So, I don't think there's any definite
timeline other than ASAP.
--
Kevin
> -Original Message-
> From: Rui Pacheco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2006 11:53
11 matches
Mail list logo
