Re: problem with Secure configuration

2009-11-18 Thread Szemere Szemere
Resurrecting an old thread. We recently upgraded from 5.0.18 to 5.1.0.x and have unsuspectingly got hammered by this feature (bug). When making application breaking changes like this between versions, it would be nice if there was a warning or error message for it. The docs are also out of date

Re: problem with Secure configuration

2009-04-19 Thread Felix Gonschorek
Thank you! this helped me alot Joachim Van der Auwera schrieb: Delving further into this. It works fine when adding the @Secure annotation on pages, it is the global configuration which fails. On closer investigation, it seems there is a change in where to provide the global configuration.

Re: problem with Secure configuration

2009-03-11 Thread Joachim Van der Auwera
Ok, on further investigation, the tapestry.secure-enabled=true cannot make a difference as this was only added in 5.1.0.1. When I add the following in my application module public static void contributeAlias( ConfigurationAliasContribution configuration ) { BaseURLSource source

Re: problem with Secure configuration

2009-03-11 Thread Joachim Van der Auwera
Delving further into this. It works fine when adding the @Secure annotation on pages, it is the global configuration which fails. On closer investigation, it seems there is a change in where to provide the global configuration. When contributing to the application defaults (like below), it