> > > > > > dynamic component-ids. What you are seeing (loopContacts_i,
i=1
> > ...)
> > > > > are
> > > > > > multiple clientId's (Element id's on the client side) rendere
by
> > one
> > > > > and
> > &g
seeing (loopContacts_i, i=1
> ...)
> > > > are
> > > > > multiple clientId's (Element id's on the client side) rendere by
> one
> > > > and
> > > > > the same component instance, whose id, the component-id on the
> > server,
&g
stance, whose id, the component-id on the
> server,
> > >
> > > > is "loopContacts". So, tapestry wouldn't recognise loopContact_0
as
> a
> > > > valid component-id anyway.
> > > >
> > > > So, I'd just try to refresh
gt; > is "loopContacts". So, tapestry wouldn't recognise loopContact_0 as
a
> > > valid component-id anyway.
> > >
> > > So, I'd just try to refresh "loopContacts" and see whether the
> > overhead
> > > of refreshing all instanc
resh "loopContacts" and see whether the
> overhead
> > of refreshing all instances really hurts.
> >
> > > -Original Message-----
> > > From: Malin Ljungh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent: Friday, July 06, 2007 9:03 AM
> > > To: Tape
sh "loopContacts" and see whether the overhead
> of refreshing all instances really hurts.
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Malin Ljungh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Friday, July 06, 2007 9:03 AM
> > To: Tapestry users
> > Subject: T4: Can I ha
and see whether the overhead
of refreshing all instances really hurts.
> -Original Message-
> From: Malin Ljungh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, July 06, 2007 9:03 AM
> To: Tapestry users
> Subject: T4: Can I have dynamic component id or how do I solve this?
>
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, July 06, 2007 9:03 AM
> To: Tapestry users
> Subject: T4: Can I have dynamic component id or how do I solve this?
>
> I have a loop - a component of type="For", displaying contacts.
> I'd like to have a component inside
I have a loop - a component of type="For", displaying contacts.
I'd like to have a component inside the loop with component id equals
something with the database key in it, the contact ID. Is that possible?
Or is there a smarter way to solve my issue?
The reason I want it this way is that I want
