Re: Tapestry 5.1.0.5 Google App Engine

2010-04-17 Thread Christian Edward Gruber
Again - can't use maven. I'm a big supporter of maven, but we have other tools internally we just arbitrarily replace. Christian. On Apr 17, 2010, at 11:20 AM, Kalle Korhonen wrote: I'm using the GAE maven plugin (http://code.google.com/p/maven-gae-plugin/) and I didn't really have to do an

Re: Tapestry 5.1.0.5 Google App Engine

2010-04-17 Thread Christian Edward Gruber
We have an alternate build system within google. We cannot use maven because it isn't compatible with what we use, and we couldn't integrate into the rest of the codebase if we separated out from the same. As to the line-up, it was simply a matter of the configuration of the war packagin

Re: Tapestry 5.1.0.5 Google App Engine

2010-04-17 Thread Kalle Korhonen
I'm using the GAE maven plugin (http://code.google.com/p/maven-gae-plugin/) and I didn't really have to do anything to get GAE going with it except to work around one minor dependency issue with the plugin itself. Tapestry-conversations (http://tynamo.org/tapestry-conversations+guide) sample is run

Re: Tapestry 5.1.0.5 Google App Engine

2010-04-17 Thread Alex Kotchnev
I do use T5 and Maven only, was there a problem with using that ? I do use Maven to build the app and have some simple hooks to launch the ant deploy script under some circumstances. Also, would you have some time to outline what you had to "line up" ? Regards, Alex K On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 4:

Re: Tapestry 5.1.0.5 Google App Engine

2010-04-17 Thread Christian Edward Gruber
We figured it out. It wasn't a T5 or GAE issue, but rather how we assembled the war using google's internal build tools. We just hadn't lined up all the pieces before, and I've only used T5 with Maven, so I'm spoiled and just hadn't had to arrange some of these pieces. Thanks for the poin

Re: Tapestry 5.1.0.5 Google App Engine

2010-04-16 Thread Alex Kotchnev
I haven't used the 1.3.2 release, as switching between the point releases always requires a bit of this unpleasant hacking / setup and the possibility of new issues. Here are the issues that I remember having to deal with (historically, not all of them might be an issue right now): * Replace the s

Re: Tapestry 5.1.0.5 Google App Engine

2010-04-16 Thread Christian Edward Gruber
Actually, we're going to use 5.2 (I'm working with Mike Taylor on this) We'll check the list archives, but a lot of what we're seeing seems related on first blush, but isn't related, because we can't get to the problem solved in those e-mails (we're not getting the main page component looke

Re: Tapestry 5.1.0.5 Google App Engine

2010-04-16 Thread Alex Kotchnev
Mike, what version of GAE are you using ? T 5.1.0.5 still has an issue that prevents it from running out of the box. Search for GAE on this list to find it. The issue is fixed in 5.2 and works like magic ( I'm using the 5.2 snapshot build w/ GAE 1.3.0) There are a number of T5 apps runn

Tapestry 5.1.0.5 Google App Engine

2010-04-16 Thread Michael Taylor
Hello Tapestry Users, I’ve been playing around with getting Tapestry 5.1.0.5 working on Google App Engine and I’m having a issue with running it on the DevApp server. Essentially the DevApp server uses a custom class loader to simulate the class loading restrictions imposed by GAE. It looks as