Any reason you couldn't just use one of the multitude of JS
frameworks? jQuery works very well for this.
--
Kevin
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 1:25 PM, Ken in nashua
wrote:
>
> I still am using T4 with dojo-0.4.3 and the tapestry script eFrastructure
> that tacos has taken advantage of.
>
> That
I still am using T4 with dojo-0.4.3 and the tapestry script eFrastructure that
tacos has taken advantage of.
That should indicate a boat load plenty of loyalty... and thank.
It would be nice to see some humble support for these though.
One of my most recent peeves was the lack of a coordina
many jira's exist on T4 and the
>> who-cares response in the user group for the most part
>>
>> Still waiting to find something that you can actually do what-we-want
>> with.
>>
>> - cheers
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> From: Inge Solvoll
e Solvoll gmail.com>Subject: Re: is T4
dead ?Newsgroups: gmane.comp.java.tapestry.userDate: 2009-01-09
07:57:07 GMT (3 days, 7 hours and 52 minutes ago)Good question.
As far as I can see, more than half of all posts to this mailing
list is
about T5. Wouldn't it be better if the mailin
ly do what-we-want with.
- cheers
From: Inge Solvoll gmail.com>Subject: Re: is T4 dead
?Newsgroups: gmane.comp.java.tapestry.userDate: 2009-01-09 07:57:07 GMT (3
days, 7 hours and 52 minutes ago)Good question.
As far as I can see, more than half of all posts to this mailing list is
Good question.
As far as I can see, more than half of all posts to this mailing list is
about T5. Wouldn't it be better if the mailing lists were splitted into two,
to improve focus for both parts? Let's face it, T4 and T5 have very little
in common, apart from a small group of people who support
Haven't seen any updates since november.
T4 has a ton of jiras and geometry issues for custom @Script and *.script
modules.Best regards Ken in nashua
_
Windows LiveTM: Keep your life in sync.
http://windowslive.com/explore?ocid=TX
