Howard Lewis Ship wrote:
DZone Refcardz http://refcardz.dzone.com/ are a series of free cheat
sheets for developers, written by book authors and industry experts on
a wide range of technical topics including: Spring, Windows
PowerShell, EJB 3, Ajax, Design Patterns, Silverlight 2 and many
Looks pretty good. Although, I'm a bit baffled by the TiA plug. It
is a bit antiquated now.
--
Kevin
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 10:44 AM, Howard Lewis Ship hls...@comcast.net wrote:
DZone Refcardz are a series of free cheat sheets for developers, written by
book authors and industry experts
Yes, they may switch it over to the Alexander's book.
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 12:16 PM, Kevin Menard nirvd...@gmail.com wrote:
Looks pretty good. Although, I'm a bit baffled by the TiA plug. It
is a bit antiquated now.
--
Kevin
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 10:44 AM, Howard Lewis Ship
Awesome! Thank you Howard!
Lewis Ship schrieb:
DZone Refcardz http://refcardz.dzone.com/ are a series of free cheat
sheets for developers, written by book authors and industry experts on
a wide range of technical topics including: Spring, Windows
PowerShell, EJB 3, Ajax, Design Patterns,
hemen wrote:
It will print the phi this is demo property file.. please refer
t:pagelink t:page=aboutHome/t:pagelink/p. --- As whole String with
HTML tags
HTML parsing is not done
In fact, Tapestry escaped the armful characters to avoid any damaging
side effects. If you actually
refer
t:pagelink t:page=aboutHome/t:pagelink/p. --- As whole String with
HTML tags
HTML parsing is not done
Please suggest me
Thanks,
Hemen
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Is-it-possible-to-use-Property-Files-with-HTML-tags-in-Tapestry-5.0-tp21308001p21308001.html
://www.nabble.com/Is-it-possible-to-use-Property-Files-with-HTML-tags-in-Tapestry-5.0-tp21308001p21308555.html
Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
Howard, why don't you post this annoncement at TSS and/or InfoQ?
The whole world should know that competitor frameworks will die hard :)
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 7:52 PM, Howard Lewis Ship hls...@gmail.com wrote:
Apache Tapestry 5.0 final release (5.0.18)
After nearly three years
.
Special thanks also to the list for coaching people on the usage of T5.
This is a big help in acquiring the knowledge to use T5 effectively.
Michael
Howard Lewis Ship schrieb:
Apache Tapestry 5.0 final release (5.0.18)
After nearly three years of development, the final release of Apache
. But that's also
true for any other framework out in space.
Special thanks also to the list for coaching people on the usage of T5.
This is a big help in acquiring the knowledge to use T5 effectively.
Michael
Howard Lewis Ship schrieb:
Apache Tapestry 5.0 final release (5.0.18)
After nearly
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 10:03 AM, Olle Hallin olle.hal...@gmail.com wrote:
Congrats Howard (and others who have contributed)!
Yep, congratulation Howard, you did an amazing job!
Just a naming question: wouldn't it be appropriate to name the release
version something in line with 5.0.GA?
It
Great news!
Knowing this framework is in production use for months now, is there a list
of success stories? I think Howard once asked on this list for such stories
and the format in which they should be reported.
Cheers,
Borut
Congratulations Howard and all contributors for making our lives as web
developpers, architects, project managers, ... easier !
Best Regards
Stephane
Howard Lewis Ship a écrit :
Apache Tapestry 5.0 final release (5.0.18)
After nearly three years of development, the final release of Apache
://www.albourne.com/email.html for important
additional terms relating to this e-mail.
- Original Message -
From: Angelo Chen angelochen...@yahoo.com.hk
To: users@tapestry.apache.org
Sent: Saturday, 13 December, 2008 2:15:47 AM GMT +02:00 Athens, Beirut,
Bucharest, Istanbul
Subject: Re: Tapestry 5.0
/email.html
for important additional terms relating to this e-mail.
- Original Message -
From: Angelo Chen angelochen...@yahoo.com.hk
To: users@tapestry.apache.org
Sent: Saturday, 13 December, 2008 2:15:47 AM GMT +02:00 Athens,
Beirut, Bucharest, Istanbul
Subject: Re: Tapestry 5.0
Apache Tapestry 5.0 final release (5.0.18)
After nearly three years of development, the final release of Apache
Tapestry 5.0 is now available for download.
Apache Tapestry 5 is a total rewrite of the Tapestry web application
framework, bringing forward Tapestry's core concepts: reusable
My congratulations to Howard and everyone else on the team. Tapestry
5.0 is an absolutely magnificent piece of work.
Regards,
Geoff Callender
On 13/12/2008, at 7:53 AM, Martijn Brinkers wrote:
Hi Howard,
Congratulations with the final release. Tapestry is awsome!
Best regards,
Martijn
good news, we finally hava final release:) do we have to do any changes to
the pom.xml? or just like before, simply update the version number?
Howard Lewis Ship wrote:
Apache Tapestry 5.0 final release (5.0.18)
* Via Maven:
dependency
groupIdorg.apache.tapestry/groupId
hi konstantin,IMHO portlets are going to get more and more important. if you lookat the new portlets 2.0 spec you will see AJAX defined to reload portletcontent, an event mechanism to notify one or more portlets, a new interportlet communication protocol, central session handling aso. With this
From Howard:
T5 should have similar portlet support to what's in T4. In fact, I've
let portlets influence a major aspect of Tapestry: as with portlets,
there are distinct action requests and portlet requests. However,
my priority is to get servlet support working, so I can't commit to when
That should be action requests and render requests.
The fact that servlet Tapestry 5 differentiates between the two will make it
easier, or at least make it more consistent, for portlet Tapestry 5.
On 12/29/06, Jan Vissers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From Howard:
T5 should have similar portlet
does it make sense at all to support portals? Does
people still use and develop portals?
I mean that with the AJAX proliferation it looks like
Clientlets make much more sense than Portlets and
therefore Portals in a sense of JSR-168 are headed to
oblivion.
What is the peoples' experience and
Will T5.0 provide continued support for JSR-168. And how about JSR-268?
Thanks,
Jan.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
So far, whenever I've added some interesting functionality.
On 12/15/06, Massimo Lusetti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/15/06, Howard Lewis Ship [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What's going on is that Tapestry is in a snapshot stage, where we don't
have
official releases published to the central
, but that did not help. Any suggestions?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/tapestry-5.0-tf2818273.html#a7867368
Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
-project
to pom.xml in my new project, but that did not help. Any suggestions?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/tapestry-5.0-tf2818273.html#a7867368
Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com
Tapestry 5 performance has been really good, for the trival demo apps I've
put together so far.
Tapestry 4 could probably be optimized a bit more; for example, it uses a
lot of StringBuffers which are pretty slow.
The overhead of the DOM is not so great, and there will be a lot of room to
On 11/21/06, Payne, Matthew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Given that 4.1 will not be out till spring 2007. Count on 2 or more years.
Though I hope I'm wrong.
Tapestry 4.1 != Tapestry 5, it's not even the same codebase. Think of
them as two different frameworks that looks very similar and have the
I am excited about the new concepts in Tapestry 5, when will it available
for?
On 11/7/06, Vinicius Carvalho [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello there! It's been a while since my last post, I tried to catch up,
but
after reading over 500 topics I gave up ;). I was checking Tapestry 5 site
(Wow it
Hello there! It's been a while since my last post, I tried to catch up, but
after reading over 500 topics I gave up ;). I was checking Tapestry 5 site
(Wow it changed so much that I could not even recognize it as Tapestry ;) ).
One thing that intrigues me is the use of DOM from the MarkupWriter.
30 matches
Mail list logo
