Re: TC 8.5 cachingAllowed=false ramifications [and potential Resource CacheSelector specification]?

2018-10-09 Thread Igal Sapir
On 10/9/2018 11:03 AM, Berneburg, Cris J. - US wrote: Mark cjb> SPECIFIC: The Excel files are [...] accessed only cjb> once. They don't need to be cached. Is it cjb> possible to declare only the Excel reports output cjb> folder as non-cache-able but leave the (default) cjb> context cache

RE: TC 8.5 cachingAllowed=false ramifications [and potential Resource CacheSelector specification]?

2018-10-09 Thread Berneburg, Cris J. - US
Mark cjb> SPECIFIC: The Excel files are [...] accessed only cjb> once. They don't need to be cached. Is it cjb> possible to declare only the Excel reports output cjb> folder as non-cache-able but leave the (default) cjb> context cache setting as-is so everything else cjb> can be cached in the

RE: TC 8.5 cachingAllowed=false ramifications?

2018-10-09 Thread Berneburg, Cris J. - US
Mark cjb> RAMBLE: The thing is, it worked in TC 6.0 cjb> but not 8.5. Is it possible a major change cjb> [...] Did TC 6.0 not cache files? mt> The resources implementation was completely mt> re-written for 8.x [...] I'm fairly sure mt> not found results weren't cached in 6.0.x. OK, thanks for

RE: TC 8.5 cachingAllowed=false ramifications?

2018-10-09 Thread Berneburg, Cris J. - US
Thanks Chris cjb> of TC 8.5.32 on Java 8u181, report output Excel cjb> files won't load (immediately). An error is cjb> displayed to the user. [...] cjb> 1. What are the ramifications of disabling the cache? cjb> IOW, what are the potential side-effects? [...] cjb> 2. Is there a "better" way to

Tomcat JNDI Authentication - No Login

2018-10-09 Thread Lee Broom
Hello My aim is to introduce a domain level authentication/authorisation security layer when accessing the http://localhost:8080/sample/ application. I don't want this web application to be openly accessible and without challenging an operator. After a frustrating and fruitless week I now

RE: log4j: Logging to same file from multiple contexts?

2018-10-09 Thread Jäkel , Guido
Dear Dave, I walk through that years before, too. Yes - you can't let write different Log4J Appenders to the same file or you get this garbage. Yes - you have property resolving here, but there are no properties you need. We did a solution using an additional servlet called at application