My apologies in advance if this has been already discussed in the group. I am
looking for experiences of the community, any nitpicks, etc.
Currently we are using standalone Tomcat version (9.x) to host a web
applications which are essentially hosting REST APIs.
We plan to move to micro services
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Thomas
> Sent: Friday, October 16, 2020 8:02 AM
> To: users@tomcat.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Weirdest Tomcat Behavior Ever?
>
> On 16/10/2020 12:37, Eric Robinson wrote:
> >> From: Mark Thomas
>
>
>
> >> I'd like to see those screen shots please. Better
On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 2:01 PM Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 29/09/2020 12:25, Mark Thomas wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > We (the Tomcat community) have some funding from Google to help us
> > improve Tomcat security. Our original plan was to use the funding to
> > support an in-person security focussed
On 16/10/2020 12:37, Eric Robinson wrote:
>> From: Mark Thomas
>> I'd like to see those screen shots please. Better still would be access to
>> the
>> captures themselves (just the relevant connections not the whole thing). I
>> believe what you are telling us but long experience tells me it
On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 3:43 PM Martin Grigorov
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to create a GraalVM native image for an application that uses
> tomcat-embed-core but it fails with the following error:
>
> [INFO] --- native-image-maven-plugin:20.2.0:native-image (default) @
> tomcat-embedded ---
>
Hi,
I am trying to create a GraalVM native image for an application that uses
tomcat-embed-core but it fails with the following error:
[INFO] --- native-image-maven-plugin:20.2.0:native-image (default) @
tomcat-embedded ---
[INFO] ImageClasspath Entry:
This is a bit of a long shot, but are you running on VMWare ESX by chance?
A few years ago, I had a problem where Tomcat would send data down the
socket, but about half the message wouldn't actually arrive at the client.
On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 5:05 AM Eric Robinson
wrote:
> Hi Mark --
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Thomas
> Sent: Friday, October 16, 2020 5:17 AM
> To: users@tomcat.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Weirdest Tomcat Behavior Ever?
>
> On 16/10/2020 10:05, Eric Robinson wrote:
> > Hi Mark --
> >
> > Those are great questions. See answers below.
> >
> >
> >>
Hi Eric,
These weird situations are sometimes best looked at by confirming what the
OS is seeing from user-space.
Can you run: sudo strace -r -f -e trace=network -p
You can then log that to a file and correlate and see if the kernel is in
fact being asked to send the response.
It's very
On 16/10/2020 10:05, Eric Robinson wrote:
> Hi Mark --
>
> Those are great questions. See answers below.
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Mark Thomas
>> Sent: Friday, October 16, 2020 2:20 AM
>> To: users@tomcat.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: Weirdest Tomcat Behavior Ever?
>>
>> On
> > 6. What timeouts are configured for the Connector?
> >
>
> Sorry, which connector are you referring to?
>
Sorry, I'm a dummy. Obviously you mean the tomcat connector.
connectionTimeout="2"
-Eric
Disclaimer : This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended
Hi Mark --
Those are great questions. See answers below.
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Thomas
> Sent: Friday, October 16, 2020 2:20 AM
> To: users@tomcat.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Weirdest Tomcat Behavior Ever?
>
> On 16/10/2020 00:27, Eric Robinson wrote:
>
>
>
> > The
On 16/10/2020 00:27, Eric Robinson wrote:
> The localhost_access log shows a request received and an HTTP 200 response
> sent, as follows...
>
> 10.51.14.133 [15/Oct/2020:12:52:45 -0400] 57 GET
> /app/code.jsp?gizmoid=64438=5=2020-10-15=0=0=71340=321072=40696=0.0715816=15102020125245.789063
13 matches
Mail list logo
