user cancels download attachment

2010-05-20 Thread Ðavîd Låndïs
Tomcat 6.0.20 Java 1.6.0_20-b02 Linux 2.6.32-22 I have a servlet that writes CSV content to the HTTPServletResponse. It uses Content-disposition of attachment and ContentType text/x-csv. The servlet creates a PrintWriter something like (pseudo code): new PrintWriter(new BufferedWriter(response.g

Re: user cancels download attachment

2010-05-20 Thread Ðavîd Låndïs
It is standalone. Thanks. On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 4:07 PM, Caldarale, Charles R wrote: >> From: Ðavîd Låndïs [mailto:dlan...@gmail.com] >> Subject: user cancels download attachment >> >> Tomcat 6.0.20 >> Java 1.6.0_20-b02 >> Linux 2.6.32-22 > > I ca

Re: user cancels download attachment

2010-05-20 Thread Ðavîd Låndïs
wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Ðavîd, > > (Wow, that's a lot of accented characters! Congratulations on probably > having a lot of forms on the web misinterpret your name! There's more > below.) > > On 5/20/2010 4:07 PM, Caldar

Re: user cancels download attachment

2010-05-20 Thread Ðavîd Låndïs
Thanks again for the info, Chris. Please excuse the formatting, I am attempting to respond inline to the points below. On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 6:16 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Ðavîd, > > On 5/20/2010 5:30 PM, Ðavîd Låndïs

Re: user cancels download attachment

2010-05-20 Thread Ðavîd Låndïs
case, if the consensus is that this has nothing to do with Tomcat (either a code problem or infrastructure issue) I suppose I should try somewhere else. But I really appreciate all the suggestions from this list so far. On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 8:19 PM, Caldarale, Charles R wrote: >> From: Ð

Re: user cancels download attachment

2010-05-20 Thread Ðavîd Låndïs
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 9:51 PM, Caldarale, Charles R wrote: >> From: Ðavîd Låndïs [mailto:dlan...@gmail.com] >> Subject: Re: user cancels download attachment >> >> I will try to debug deeper down into the platform. > > What connector are you using?  Blocking, N

upgrade 7.0.16 -- 7.0.19 causes JVM crash due to apr?

2011-07-21 Thread Ðavîd Låndïs
I just upgraded from 7.0.16 to 7.0.19 on Ubuntu. Downloaded Tomcat from main apache site. The JVM (jdk1.6.0_26) did not change. Consistently the process is crashing on me after a couple minutes using the server. Everything works fine in my apps for a few minutes then crash. It is something to do th

Re: upgrade 7.0.16 -- 7.0.19 causes JVM crash due to apr?

2011-07-22 Thread Ðavîd Låndïs
the apr libraries I have installed. On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 3:55 PM, Ðavîd Låndïs wrote: > I just upgraded from 7.0.16 to 7.0.19 on Ubuntu. Downloaded Tomcat > from main apache site. The JVM (jdk1.6.0_26) did not change. > Consistently the process is crashing on me after a couple minutes &

Re: 2 POST requests to underlying Server

2010-08-10 Thread Ðavîd Låndïs
3) As I have already said We have put a Java script filter to disable multiple Clicks for dual request from the Browser ( IE 7+ / FF 3+ ) I had a similar issue once due to jQuery. If you attach the same click listener twice to the same button, it'll submit 2 POST's or GET's for one mouse click (

Splitting Content Across Multiple Domains

2010-10-18 Thread Ðavîd Låndïs
I am considering creating another Host in my Tomcat server and creating another .war file with static content for that additional host. So the links to static content generated by my primary application will point to the domain name of this new host. Here are the two hostnames for example: app.exa

Re: Splitting Content Across Multiple Domains

2010-10-19 Thread Ðavîd Låndïs
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 10:49 PM, Caldarale, Charles R wrote: > > I think you may be wasting your time.  Have you determined that you actually > have a performance problem, or are you fixing a non-existent problem? I don't expect the technique to make that much difference on its own, but it's a

Re: Splitting Content Across Multiple Domains

2010-10-19 Thread Ðavîd Låndïs
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 7:35 AM, Pid wrote: > > And I'm not sure what actual performance gain you'd get from hosting it > on the same IP address.  From memory, my experience was that the > performance gain was barely detectable and only occurred when the app > was on a separate IP address. Hmm, i