-Original Message-
From: Konstantin Kolinko [mailto:knst.koli...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2012 11:50 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: web.xml and schema location
2012/4/18 Mark Claassen :
> Back in Tomcat 5, we had the problem with tomcat trying to access
> java.s
Back in Tomcat 5, we had the problem with tomcat trying to access java.sun.com.
Lots of our servers are behind firewalls, so this
caused an error in the log. We realized one way to fix this was just to remove
the schemaLocation attribute from the web.xml files.
Below is the top of the main web
I am not sure what your exact situation here is, but the user certificate
stuff is only available if Tomcat requests it. And Tomcat only does this if
Tomcat is using certificate based SSL authentication. I don't believe this
will work if an Apache webserver is handling the SSL negotiation.
Mark
t: Tuesday, June 12, 2007 10:47 PM
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: Re: Using log4J and getting rid of default logs in Tomcat 6
"Mark Claassen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Thanks for the reply.
>
> I did get some logging to work
apache.org
Subject: Re: Using log4J and getting rid of default logs in Tomcat 6
See the note at the top of
http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-6.0-doc/logging.html. By default, TC 6 only
uses Juli for it's internal logging.
"Mark Claassen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
:
[/host-manager] =
like:
log4j.logger.org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.[Catalina].[localhost]=I
NFO, MANAGER
Thanks,
Mark
-Original Message-
From: Mark Claassen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2007 11:31 AM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: Using
I would like to have all my logging go through log4J and not have the
default XXX.date.log files created. Is there a way to do this? I got log4j
working, as it says in the docs, but the localhost.date.log is still created
and written to. From what I understand, I will need to put a
log4j.propert
-Original Message-
From: Mark Claassen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 08, 2007 9:29 AM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: Using Javac instead of JDT to compile JSPs
Has anyone tried to get the jasper compiler to be something other than the
JDT? I tried several thing
with me.
Regards.
On 6/11/07, Mark Claassen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Humm. I don't think this is how the certificate system is supposed to
> be used. The intention is that the truststore handles certificates
> authorities you trust.
>
> For an example, let&#x
Humm. I don't think this is how the certificate system is supposed to be
used. The intention is that the truststore handles certificates authorities
you trust.
For an example, let's switch to the browser.
Browsers generally trust Verisgn and Thwart out of the box. You can see
these certifica
. Still, I may investigate
it further this weekend.
-Original Message-
From: Caldarale, Charles R [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 08, 2007 4:23 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Using Javac instead of JDT to compile JSPs
> From: Mark Claassen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTEC
to compile JSPs
> From: Mark Claassen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Using Javac instead of JDT to compile JSPs
>
> Even with this fix, neither of the values below worked.
> com.sun.tools.javac.main.Main
Again, that's not the right class; from t
PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Using Javac instead of JDT to compile JSPs
> From: Mark Claassen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Using Javac instead of JDT to compile JSPs
>
> com.sun.tools.javac.main.JavaCompiler
That appears to be the wrong class. Try just com.sun.tools.j
/co
mmons-logging-api.jar
Thanks again,
Mark
-Original Message-
From: Caldarale, Charles R [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 08, 2007 1:10 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Using Javac instead of JDT to compile JSPs
> From: Mark Claassen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subj
Has anyone tried to get the jasper compiler to be something other than the
JDT? I tried several things, each of them not working.
The docs say an alternative compiler can be specified, but makes no mention
of how to specify it.
This seems to be controlled by settings in the web.xml.
Below is a
Now that I see Tomcat 6.0 is on it's way, I was wondering if OCSP is going
to be included? This is being required by more and more people these days
(like the US government).
If there are no plans to include it yet, how can this issue be escalated? I
see that OCSP support is bundled into the new
client would have problems too. Still, it is
> something I can look in to, as I am currently at a loss for any other
> theories.
>
> Lastly, setting the debug level in a connector does not seem to do
anything
> for me. What is the secret to getting debug output on the connectors?
>
output on the connectors?
Mark
-Original Message-
From: Mark Claassen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 5:04 PM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: Random HTTP 502 errors
I was wondering if anyone could shed some light on some strange 502 errors I
am having
I was wondering if anyone could shed some light on some strange 502 errors I
am having when going through a proxy. We are using a relatively new proxy
server Sun-Java-System-Web-Proxy-Server/4.0
The error seems to be originating between Tomcat and the proxy. When the
error occurs, the proxy logs
Does anyone have any experience with this?
-Original Message-
From: Mark Claassen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2006 12:26 PM
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: Tomcat and OCSP
Does the new support for OCSP in Java 5.0 have any impact on how
certificates are
Does the new support for OCSP in Java 5.0 have any impact on how
certificates are handled in Tomcat?
http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/guide/security/pki-tiger.html
It looks like it might just work if it is set up right in the java property
files. I checked the mailing list archives and found
the email addresses
> From: Mark Claassen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Say Tomcat is on a
> machine called TestMachine.
> If I put "127.0.0.1" in the address field, it accepts connections of
> the form "http: //127.0.0.1/..." only It does not accept connection
nterfacename
Regards
Andrew
On 12/06/2006, at 3:08 PM, Peter Crowther wrote:
>> From: Mark Claassen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Say Tomcat is on a
>> machine called TestMachine.
>> If I put "127.0.0.1" in the address field, it accepts connections of
>> t
our server.xml you will add an address element and specify it as:
127.0.0.1
Leo
____
From: Mark Claassen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2006 10:51 AM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: [SPAM:] - RE: Restricting access to loc
Thanks. I thought I heard that it was possible though
the address, but was not sure. I read this in the docs, but I guess I
didn't / don't understand the short explanation of
"address".
From: Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2006 1:24
PMTo: To
Is there to configure an HTTP Connector to only allow connections from
localhost? We have a server that has an HTTPS port that handles all public
access. However, we would like to leave a non SSL port open for a
monitoring program we have running on the same machine. We would like to
not allow
26 matches
Mail list logo
