Hi,
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 2:03 PM, Stephen Nelson-Smith
wrote:
> Hi Daniel.
>
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 1:55 PM, Daniel Mikusa wrote:
>> On Nov 20, 2012, at 5:53 AM, Stephen Nelson-Smith wrote:
>> I've encountered this with Tomcat clustering on CentOS in the p
Hi Daniel.
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 1:55 PM, Daniel Mikusa wrote:
> On Nov 20, 2012, at 5:53 AM, Stephen Nelson-Smith wrote:
> I've encountered this with Tomcat clustering on CentOS in the past. Tomcat's
> default configuration for the cluster receiver will automatically loo
Hi,
I'm trying to test simple session sharing using SimpleTCPCluster on
Tomcat 7.0.32.
Following the documentation, I've uncommented the element, and
ensured is in the web.xml of the examples web app.
>From the docs:
- All your session attributes must implement java.io.Serializable
I know th
Hi Filip,
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 10:44 PM, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> use mod_proxy_http or mod_jk,
I am now but I don't understand why it behaved as it did - any idea?
>> I have an application which parses XML. It sits behind an Apache
>> Httpd 2.2 server using
Hello,
> Yes - I'll package 6.0.18 this afternoon and test it this evening.
Initial tests look positive - will do more extensive tests this
morning. Thanks very much for the suggestion.
S.
-
To start a new topic, e-mail: users
Hi Rainer,
> This reminds me of some problem we found when fixing BZ 44494. Could you
> please try with 6.0.18? Your symptoms don't really fit 44494 exactly, but
> there's a chance 6.0.18 fixed it.
Yes - I'll package 6.0.18 this afternoon and test it this evening.
S.
---
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 8:12 PM, Stephen Nelson-Smith
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Testing:
>
> * Submitting straight to one of the new tomcat 6.0.16 machines, over
> http, works without fail - the XML is parsed.
Ok so now it transpires that actually direct http to Tomcat
I have an application that parses xml. I send it xml using another
little app, which makes an http post. The averge size of a post is
about 3000 characters. Here is the significant information:
* I have a system which is being replaced, which consists of RHEL3,
httpd 2.0, mod_jk and Tomcat 6.0.
Hi,
I have an application which parses XML. It sits behind an Apache
Httpd 2.2 server using mod_proxy_ajp. I am finding that if I POST
more than about 1600 chars, the POST gets truncated, and I get an XML
parse error.
Httpd logs show:
[Tue Sep 30 19:40:27 2008] [debug] mod_proxy_ajp.c(206): pr
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 1:45 AM, Shaun Senecal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Are you using the ClusterSingleSignOn Valve?
I'm not, no.
I have httpd 2.2 on the front-end, with a balancer pool thus:
ProxyRequests Off
ProxyVia Off
ProxyPreserveHost On
ProxyErrorOverride On
ProxyTimeout 60
B
Good morning,
> By "error", I just meant that I'd get redirected to the login page
> instead of the expected page. Sorry to confuse. There are no error
> pages, logs or messages. Just that I got switched to a different node.
>> If you want to debug a little more: In Tomcat you can add a
>> %S t
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 9:40 PM, Caldarale, Charles R
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Stephen Nelson-Smith wrote:
>>
>> My server.xml was not originally written by me, and
>> has been handed down and modified over the ages. It
>> was originally from Tomcat 4.
Hi,
> When you move Tomcat to another machine, no matches and you get a
> 400 error.
The problem was that I was hitting the loadbalancer with name lb1 or
www.mysite.com. This was being proxied to machines called tomcat1,
tomcat2 etc. Changing the alias to www.mysite.com seems to have fixed
thi
content.
2) Move stock server.xml into place
I get content.
I have no idea what's going on there... any ideas / suggestions?
S.
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 8:45 AM, Stephen Nelson-Smith
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a server running apache 2.2, configured to proxy to another
&
I have a server running apache 2.2, configured to proxy to another
tomcat server, running 6.0.16. This works fine with the stock
server.xml, and the webapps, but when I move my own server.xml into
place, apache reports a 400, and I get no page.
Some background:
* The apache config works in produ
> It is lib/servlet-api.jar
Thank you - perfect.
S.
-
To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I have an application which makes use of servlet.jar, as found in the
tomcat 4 release. Under tomcat 6 this isn't anywhere to be found, so
my app doesn't work unless I copy the tomcat 4 jar over. Is there a
tomcat 6 equivalent?
S.
--
Hi,
> If Nginx can do HTTP proxying, you can use that instead of ajp13 if you
> wish.
It certainly can - and very fast indeed. So would I then be
reconfiguring Tomcat to use its own http server? At present apache
serves http and passes the ajp stuff to tomcat.
S.
-
Hello,
I'm currently using Apache 2.2 and mod_proxy_ajp to load balance
across 3 tomcat servers.
I'm considering looking at nginx as Apache seems somewhat resource
intensive. Has anyone on the list tried this? Does nginx support (or
need to support) ajp13?
S.
-
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 4:56 PM, Peter Crowther
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > From: Stephen Nelson-Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > UPDATE currencies SET symbol = '£' WHERE ISO_CODE = 'GBP';
>
> Ah! A good, soft solution! I hope there was
Hi...
> Changing the encoding in the first. You want to change the second.
I changed the second.
> If they're writing XHTML rather than HTML, I'm not sure that entity exists -
> they need to check. That may be why they're writing the value directly,
> although £ would also do the job.
UP
Hi...
> What encoding are you using?
The config files all used UTF-8. I've changed them to ISO8859-1 and
restarted Tomcat, but I see the same behaviour.
> You can go hunting for all the places in which the encoding could be
> specified
At the Tomcat level?
> or you can tell the developers
Hello,
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 3:30 PM, Yuval Perlov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Probably the encoding has changed
Which encoding? I don't believe the source code has changed.
How would I test and/or change this? Where?
S.
I've just upgraded from 4.1.37 to 6.0.16. My app works, but where my
code usually displays a British Pound sign, I get an odd char - a ? in
a diamond on Linux, an empty box on Windows.
Here's the html that the app produces, shown in hexl-mode in emacs:
5860: 223e 4361 7368 2050 7269 6365 20a
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 11:21 PM, Caldarale, Charles R
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > From: Stephen Nelson-Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > How about running eg 3 x xen vms? The machine seems rarely pushed for
> > CPU, and with 3 vms I could load balance across th
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 10:53 PM, Caldarale, Charles R
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > but so far I've not seen memory usage go over 1G.
>
> There is (or at least was) a bug in the Sun 1.4.2 JVM that didn't do the
> arithmetic right when heap sizes were over 2GB due to treating some
> unsigned
Hi,
I have a new machine with 8G of RAM, running a 32 bit 2.6 kernel
(CentOS 5). It is running an application inside 4.1.37 with Java
1.4.2.
Given that we only have a 32 bit address space, is it fair to say that
I can't use more than 2G of RAM for my Java virtual machine?
I tried to prove this
Hello,
What is this for:
factory
org.apache.catalina.users.MemoryUserDatabaseFactory
pathname
conf/tomcat-users.xml
It seems to provide the user database used by the web-based admin
tools. I don't use there, and
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 1:02 PM, Christopher Schultz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Stephen,
>
>
> Stephen Nelson-Smith wrote:
> | I've noticed on one machine (4.1.31 / RHEL 3) as soon as I start Java
> |
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 10:13 AM, Peter Crowther
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > From: Stephen Nelson-Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Operating system?
> >
> > RHEL 5.
>
> http://java.sun.com/javase/6/webnotes/install/system-configurations.html
Hi,
I've noticed on one machine (4.1.31 / RHEL 3) as soon as I start Java
I see many Java processes:
$ pgrep -l java
1783 java
1844 java
1848 java
1849 java
1880 java
1881 java
1882 java
1883 java
1885 java
1886 java
1887 java
1888 java
1889 java
1890 java
1891 java
1892 java
1893 java
1894 java
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 9:29 AM, Peter Crowther
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > From: Stephen Nelson-Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > I have a machine with 2 x Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5430 @
> > 2.66GHz and 8G of RAM.
> >
> > If I want to make best use o
Hi,
I have a machine with 2 x Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5430 @ 2.66GHz and 8G of RAM.
If I want to make best use of this RAM, should I run this in 64 bit
(48 bit hack) mode?
If so are there any gotchas with JDKs, 64 bit Tomcat etc? Also we use
some specific libraries - ojdbc14, bfopdf, ojdbc14 for
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 4:00 PM, Jim Jagielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Seems to me you are using Apache as a front-end to
> TC. In which case you are telling Apache that whatever is
> under /examples should be handled by TC, everything else
> is local... Right so far?
Yes in this case. In
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 6:15 PM, Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Stephen Nelson-Smith wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 2:37 PM, David kerber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> 4.1.37 is probably your best short-term solution, and work toward 6
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 2:37 PM, David kerber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 4.1.37 is probably your best short-term solution, and work toward 6.x in
> the mid-to-long term.
That was my gut feeling. Could you explain why that is? Is 5.5 a
wasteland? I'll need to understand the rationale behind
Hi,
So, I'm running an app which the development house say *has* to run on
4.1.31. I'm not especially happy about this, and will try running it
under 4.1.37, but the developers say they *might* be able to get it to
run under 5.5. I seem to recall a conversation in which I was told
that 5.5 isn't
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 12:38 PM, Pid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Stephen Nelson-Smith wrote:
> > I have deployed an application under Tomcat, fronted by Apache. I am
> > experiencing what looks like strange redirects when I try to use the
> > application.
> &g
I have deployed an application under Tomcat, fronted by Apache. I am
experiencing what looks like strange redirects when I try to use the
application.
The front page is a login screen, but if I try to login, Tomcat
attempts to locate a resource called /Login.jsp, which doesn't exist.
The page sh
Hi,
I have an application which, due to restrictions by third party
developers must run on Tomcat 4.1.31 with Java version 1.4.2_11.
I am deploying this on a new RHEL 5 machine, with
httpd-2.2.3-11.el5_1.3. From my reading, it appears that
mod_proxy_ajp is the way to go, and I aim to loadbalance
40 matches
Mail list logo
