Re: [OT] log4j, fileappender, owner, group, and umask

2007-03-02 Thread stevethames
Hi Dan. Thanks for responding. Yes, that's true, the file is owned by the tomcat user. My mod_perl stuff runs under "apache" (the httpd user) and I have some Perl daemons that run as root. In Perl, using log4perl, I can set the owner, group, and umask of the log file for file creation. I have

Re: [OT] log4j, fileappender, owner, group, and umask

2007-03-02 Thread Daniel Stephens
If they are all the same group, then I would suggest just setting the umask to 022 or 027.. But let me say I'm not a Unix admin and I'm not a 100% sure of all the down falls here. I do know that 022 will work I've done some things with my source code, and others in my group not able to "write" to

Re: [OT] log4j, fileappender, owner, group, and umask

2007-03-06 Thread stevethames
Thanks for the input, Dan. Actually, I am aware of how permissions. The question is how to set permissions, owner, group on a log file created by FileAppender when it actually creates the log file. For the moment, I have solved the problem by using a separate log file for tomcat. Daniel Stephe

Re: [OT] log4j, fileappender, owner, group, and umask

2007-03-06 Thread Daniel Stephens
Ok cool.. I just had a round with our umask and groups being setup incorrectly. just a mess. On 3/6/07, stevethames <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Thanks for the input, Dan. Actually, I am aware of how permissions. The question is how to set permissions, owner, group on a log file created by Fi

Re: [OT] log4j, fileappender, owner, group, and umask

2007-03-06 Thread stevethames
Here's the thing about umask. In the Unix file system, file permissions is an octal value with one digit for each user type. When using chmod, these permissions can be set directly and do not require a leading zero. chmod 664 file Each digit represents a user class and each bit within the digi