> From: Richard Gemmell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Appropriate version of Tomcat
>
> How does using the .bat files make debugging easier?
Primarily because it gives you a console window for things like
triggering thread dumps. If your environment includes any native
David Kerber wrote:
Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
I'd recommend NOT using the .exe download, but instead use the .zip:
1) The .exe leaves out the .bat files, which make experimenting with and
debugging Tomcat much easier.
Chuck. How does using the .bat files make debugging easier? (I'm not
a
Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
From: Richard Gemmell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Appropriate version of Tomcat
I'd recommend the Windows Service Installer version.
I'd recommend NOT using the .exe download, but instead use the .zip:
1) The .exe leaves out the
Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
From: Richard Gemmell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Appropriate version of Tomcat
I'd recommend the Windows Service Installer version.
I'd recommend NOT using the .exe download, but instead use the .zip:
1) The .exe leaves out the .bat fi
> From: Richard Gemmell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Appropriate version of Tomcat
>
> I'd recommend the Windows Service Installer version.
I'd recommend NOT using the .exe download, but instead use the .zip:
1) The .exe leaves out the .bat files, which make
Hi Anita,
Anita Thomas wrote:
I'd like to build a jsp website which uses libraries like Jena
> and some other educational java packages. My system is running
> Windows XP.
Is Tomcat 6 Windows Service Installer the appropriate choice for me ?
> Or I need other versions like zip ?
Dear All
I'd like to build a jsp website which uses libraries like Jena and some other
educational java packages. My system is running Windows XP.
Is Tomcat 6 Windows Service Installer the appropriate choice for me ? Or I
need other versions like zip ?
Thank you for your h