On 08/25/10 16:51, David kerber wrote:
> On 8/25/2010 10:44 AM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
>>> I know alot depends on the applications architecture but just how
>>> good is tomcat?
>>
>> Really effing good.
>
> +1
>
Tomcat itself is usually the last thing to be worried about when it comes to
per
On 8/25/2010 10:44 AM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
...
I know alot depends on the applications architecture but just how
good is tomcat?
Really effing good.
+1
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
F
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Yawar,
On 8/21/2010 8:59 AM, Yawar Khan wrote:
> Guys, is tomcat stable enough to host large scale production
> applications getting 1500+ hits everyday?
Certainly.
1500 hits/day is nothing. You could do that on a smartphone.
Our daily average for
On 21/08/2010 20:13, Ken Fox wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 2:42 PM, Pid * wrote:
>> We don't usually count web traffic in hits any more, because a single
>> page could easily cause 100 hits.
>
> I think hits to your app servers is still an appropriate way to think
> about your server load. If
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 2:42 PM, Pid * wrote:
> We don't usually count web traffic in hits any more, because a single
> page could easily cause 100 hits.
I think hits to your app servers is still an appropriate way to think
about your server load. If a page view generates 100 hits to your
Tomcat
On 21 Aug 2010, at 18:09, Ken Fox wrote:
> My company has run Tomcat apps on Amazon's EC2 that have exceeded 1,500 hits
> per *second*. We use Amazon's load balancer in front of a variable number of
> Tomcat instances (each on their own EC2 instance). For 1,500 hits per day
> you probably only ne
My company has run Tomcat apps on Amazon's EC2 that have exceeded 1,500 hits
per *second*. We use Amazon's load balancer in front of a variable number of
Tomcat instances (each on their own EC2 instance). For 1,500 hits per day
you probably only need one small EC2 instance running a single Tomcat.
Yawar Khan wrote:
Guys, is tomcat stable enough to host large scale production applications
getting 1500+ hits everyday? and as much concurrent database connections. I know
alot depends on the applications architecture but just how good is tomcat?
My app has approx 550 - 600 simultaneous
thank you marco for your insight and sharing your experience.
From: Marco Castillo
To: Tomcat Users List
Sent: Sat, August 21, 2010 7:09:09 PM
Subject: Re: How stable is Tomcat?
I totally agree with Michel. We developed a JSF 2.0 application using Tomcat
as
> From: Yawar Khan [mailto:khanya...@yahoo.com]
> Subject: How stable is Tomcat?
>
> is tomcat stable enough to host large scale production
> applications
http://wiki.apache.org/tomcat/PoweredBy
> getting 1500+ hits everyday?
As others have stated, 1500 hits a day is down
: "Yawar Khan"
> To: "Tomcat Users"
> Sent: Saturday, August 21, 2010 8:59 AM
> Subject: How stable is Tomcat?
>
>
>
> Guys, is tomcat stable enough to host large scale production applications
>> getting 1500+ hits everyday? and as much concurrent da
;
Sent: Saturday, August 21, 2010 8:59 AM
Subject: How stable is Tomcat?
Guys, is tomcat stable enough to host large scale production applications
getting 1500+ hits everyday? and as much concurrent database connections.
I know
alot depends on the applications architecture bu
Guys, is tomcat stable enough to host large scale production applications
getting 1500+ hits everyday? and as much concurrent database connections. I
know
alot depends on the applications architecture but just how good is tomcat?
Dima,
Please don't steal threads. Start a new one next time.
> How stable is tomcat with Sun's HotSpot JVM 1.5?
>
> How stable is tomcat against apache or other webservers?
They are not directly comparable (Apache httpd and Tomcat) as Tomcat
does things Apache httpd cannot
Dima Retov wrote:
Thanks Dave.
What version of JVM have you used?
I believe (not sure) it's 1.5.0_06 on the server; I'm running _07 on my
dev machine. As Rainer mentioned, don't try to use hot deployment for
busy apps; I always stop tomcat for updates, so my updates tend to be
saved up a
-
From: Rainer Jung [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2006 2:06 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: How stable is tomcat
I also know a couple of instances which ran under high load for a couple
of months. Usually though the frequency for changes in the apps are
higher
have you used?
>
> Wednesday, November 1, 2006, 8:57:19 PM, you wrote:
>
> DK> Dima Retov wrote:
>
>>> How stable is tomcat with Sun's HotSpot JVM 1.5?
>>>
>>> Right now we have apache servers that are up for 3 and 4 months.
>>> So I
Thanks Dave.
What version of JVM have you used?
Wednesday, November 1, 2006, 8:57:19 PM, you wrote:
DK> Dima Retov wrote:
>>How stable is tomcat with Sun's HotSpot JVM 1.5?
>>
>>Right now we have apache servers that are up for 3 and 4 months.
>>So I guess
notor
your memory usage in the first weeks to check, if it gets stable.
Regards,
Rainer
David Kerber schrieb:
> Dima Retov wrote:
>
>> How stable is tomcat with Sun's HotSpot JVM 1.5?
>>
>> Right now we have apache servers that are up for 3 and 4 months.
>> So
Dima Retov wrote:
How stable is tomcat with Sun's HotSpot JVM 1.5?
Right now we have apache servers that are up for 3 and 4 months.
So I guess apache 1.3 may works for months.
How stable is tomcat against apache or other webservers?
Would tomcat be able to work 1 year without re
asource? In context.xml, or in server.xml
>>> with additional, per-context configuration in context.xml?
>>>
>>> Can you show us the configuration for your JNDI DataSource, including
How stable is tomcat with Sun's HotSpot JVM 1.5?
Right now we have apache serve
21 matches
Mail list logo
