RE: [External] Re: CVE-2021-44228 Log4j 2 Vulnerability - Runtime vs compile time Java version

2021-12-13 Thread Scott,Tim
> From: Juri Berlanda > Sent: 13 December 2021 15:03 > Subject: [External] Re: CVE-2021-44228 Log4j 2 Vulnerability - Runtime vs > compile time Java version > Hi, > we were affected - we use an AccessLogValve, which logs to Log4j2 and we > use Log4j as java.util.logging LogManager. We already

RE: [External] Re: CVE-2021-44228 Log4j 2 Vulnerability - Runtime vs compile time Java version

2021-12-13 Thread Scott,Tim
HI Mark, Thank you. That clarifies something I was not quite getting. Surely setting a system property “log4j2.formatMsgNoLookups” does not require a particular JRE version? And no, it doesn’t. Yes – we’d need to upgrade log4j2 and/or add that parameter. Whilst the JRE version might deliver