On 30.06.2010 16:18, János Löbb wrote:
workers.properties
---
ps=/
worker.list=pub-app01, pub-app02, pub-app03, pub-app04, pub-app05, pub-lb
worker.pub-app01.type=ajp13
worker.pub-app01.host=app01
worker.pub-app01.port=8009
worker.pub-app01.socket_keepalive=1
worker.pub-app02.t
> workers.properties
> ---
> ps=/
>
> worker.list=pub-app01, pub-app02, pub-app03, pub-app04, pub-app05, pub-lb
>
> worker.pub-app01.type=ajp13
> worker.pub-app01.host=app01
> worker.pub-app01.port=8009
> worker.pub-app01.socket_keepalive=1
>
> worker.pub-app02.type=ajp13
> worke
I now have made the change and it seems to be working (fingers crossed).
I have a couple of people testing it out, so fingers crossed!
OK, it now works correctly. The only issue I have is that Apache is now
adding .number to the end of each request.
If I go to myapp/forum, the first time I g
On 30.06.2010 13:10, Gabriel Tabares wrote:
have you also set de directive in de workers.properties I suggested?
in your case that should look like
worker.pub-app01.domain=pub-app01
etc
My apologies, I am doing 10 things at the time and missed that bit.
I now have made the change and it s
I'm not sure if this is what you are looking for but I just checked how
our stuff is set up here and wondered if you have the jvm route mapped
in the server xml for the tomcat instances you want loadbalanced?
Paul
Tomcats:
All of them have a jvmRoute of pub-app0X, where X goes fro
have you also set de directive in de workers.properties I suggested?
in your case that should look like
worker.pub-app01.domain=pub-app01
etc
My apologies, I am doing 10 things at the time and missed that bit.
I now have made the change and it seems to be working (fingers crossed).
I have
On 30/06/2010 11:33, M.H.G. Emmerig wrote:
> you beat me to it I think
>
> regards
>
> Milko Emmerig
> I'm not sure if this is what you are looking for but I just checked how
> our stuff is set up here and wondered if you have the jvm route mapped
> in the server xml for the tomcat instances you
Subject
Please respond to Re: Hello and Tomcat issues with
"Tomcat Users sticky sessions
I'm not sure if this is what you are looking for but I just checked how
our stuff is set up here and wondered if you have the jvm route mapped
in the server xml for the tomcat instances you want loadbalanced?
Paul
Sorry if it wasn't clear on my original message, they already have the
j
Yes sorry! Slow morning here today.. :)
From: M.H.G. Emmerig [mailto:m.h.g.emme...@dnb.nl]
Sent: 30 June 2010 11:33
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Hello and Tomcat issues with sticky sessions
you beat me to it I think
regards
Milko Emmerig
"Ockleford Paul (NHS Connecting for H
2010 12:31
Subject
RE: Hello and Tomcat issues with
Please respond to sticky sessions
"Tomcat Users
Hello gabriel
I think you should have the following in your configuration:
in de workers definition something like
worker.pub-app01.domain=pub-app01-jvm
and in your tomcat server.xml
regards
Milko Emmerig
I'm not sure if this is what you are looking for but I just checked how our
stuff is set up here and wondered if you have the jvm route mapped in the
server xml for the tomcat instances you want loadbalanced?
Paul
-Original Message-
From: Gabriel Tabares [mailto:gabriel.taba...@robo
On 06/01/2010 11:09, Cristobal Castro wrote:
> hello
> i just installed tomcat on win xp, now how can i set my firt project ? i
> see the tomcat folder in C:, do i need to put my first program in one of
> those folders? just like i did with normal apache ? (ex htdocs folder ->
> called on browser b
009 at 7:14 PM, veena pandit wrote:
>
> > http://www.jsptut.com/
> >
> > On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 9:39 AM, Caldarale, Charles R <
> > chuck.caldar...@unisys.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > From: veena pandit [mailto:v.kri...@gmail.com]
> > > >
:
>
> > > From: veena pandit [mailto:v.kri...@gmail.com]
> > > Subject: Re: hello world
> > >
> > > it was chapter 1 in a web based tutorial for JSP. :-)
> >
> > Can you provide a link to the tutorial? I'd like to see what it says.
> >
> &g
http://www.jsptut.com/
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 9:39 AM, Caldarale, Charles R <
chuck.caldar...@unisys.com> wrote:
> > From: veena pandit [mailto:v.kri...@gmail.com]
> > Subject: Re: hello world
> >
> > it was chapter 1 in a web based tutorial for JSP. :-)
>
> From: veena pandit [mailto:v.kri...@gmail.com]
> Subject: Re: hello world
>
> it was chapter 1 in a web based tutorial for JSP. :-)
Can you provide a link to the tutorial? I'd like to see what it says.
- Chuck
THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR OTHE
Well I had to know, because it was chapter 1 in a web based tutorial for
JSP. :-)
Thanks,
Veena
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 9:15 AM, André Warnier wrote:
> veena pandit wrote:
>
>> It was actually:
>>
>> http://localhost:8080/webapps/Hello/Hello.html. Sorry for the misprint.
>>
>> This must be th
>> http://localhost:8080/webapps/Hello/Hello.html. Sorry for the misprint.
>>
> This must be the longest-running thread about a Hello World application
> ever, in any programming language.
> :-)
It looks to me that you should remove the webapps from the url.
What is your local path
What is the s
veena pandit wrote:
It was actually:
http://localhost:8080/webapps/Hello/Hello.html. Sorry for the misprint.
This must be the longest-running thread about a Hello World application
ever, in any programming language.
:-)
-
T
It was actually:
http://localhost:8080/webapps/Hello/Hello.html. Sorry for the misprint.
Veena
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 6:07 AM, S Arvind wrote:
> What path you gave to get that html in browser?
>
> -Arvind S
>
> *
> "Many of lifes failure are people who did not realize how close they were
> t
http://localhost:8080/webapps/Hello.htm
l
-Veena
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 6:07 AM, S Arvind wrote:
> What path you gave to get that html in browser?
>
> -Arvind S
>
> *
> "Many of lifes failure are people who did not realize how close they were
> to
> success when they gave up."
> -Thomas Edison
What path you gave to get that html in browser?
-Arvind S
*
"Many of lifes failure are people who did not realize how close they were to
success when they gave up."
-Thomas Edison
*
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 5:48 AM, veena pandit wrote:
> How to configure Hello.html in Tomcat?
>
> Where do I pla
> From: S Arvind [mailto:arvindw...@gmail.com]
> Subject: Re: hello world
>
> rename the file name to index.html , or change the welcome page entry
> in web.xml to hello.html
As previously stated, that's a really bad idea. It would overwrite Tomcat's
default home pa
rename the file name to index.html , or change the welcome page entry in
web.xml to hello.html
-Arvind S
*
"Many of lifes failure are people who did not realize how close they were to
success when they gave up."
-Thomas Edison
*
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 6:23 AM, veena pandit wrote:
> I tried pla
I tried placing it in a webapps directory under tomcat root. do i need to
configure in web.xml?
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 8:25 PM, Hassan Schroeder <
hassan.schroe...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 5:18 PM, veena pandit wrote:
> > How to configure Hello.html in Tomcat?
> >
> > Where
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 5:18 PM, veena pandit wrote:
> How to configure Hello.html in Tomcat?
>
> Where do I place the following file? How to access it from the server?
Where did you try placing it, and what makes you think that wasn't
the right place?
--
Hassan Schroeder -
André Warnier wrote:
> Mark Thomas wrote:
>> Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
> [...]
>>> I'm not privy to the thought processes behind the packaging of the
>>> .exe and .zip downloads, but I don't like it, whatever it was. I
>>> think all bits and pieces should be in all the packages. The .exe
>>> in
Mark Thomas wrote:
Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
[...]
I'm not privy to the thought processes behind the packaging of the .exe and
.zip downloads, but I don't like it, whatever it was. I think all bits and
pieces should be in all the packages. The .exe installer could be made smart
enough to
ned within this transmission.
> From: chuck.caldar...@unisys.com
> To: users@tomcat.apache.org
> Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 08:55:16 -0600
> Subject: RE: Hello
>
> > From: André Warnier [mailto:a...@ice-sa.com]
> > Subject: Re: Hello
> >
> > I understand that,
Can people please use something a little more descriptive than "Hello"?
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Thomas"
To: "Tomcat Users List"
Sent: Friday, February 13, 2009 10:19 AM
Subject: Re: Hello
Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
From: André Warnier [m
Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
>> From: André Warnier [mailto:a...@ice-sa.com]
>> Subject: Re: Hello
>>
>> I understand that, but how would a newbie understand this ?
>
> Read the mailing list?
>
>> I didn't know that. But who (other than an expert) woul
> From: André Warnier [mailto:a...@ice-sa.com]
> Subject: Re: Hello
>
> I understand that, but how would a newbie understand this ?
Read the mailing list?
> I didn't know that. But who (other than an expert) would
> know that, looking at those links alone ?
Actual
Pieter Temmerman wrote:
Luckily I'm not a windows user, because all of this seems rather
confusing to me.
It is confusing to anyone, except the wizards themselves.
There are rumors going around that this is exactly the point.
---
[mailto:a...@ice-sa.com]
> >> Subject: Re: Hello
> >>
> >> Vista 32-bit -> 32-bit Java JDK or JRE
> >> Vista 64-bit -> 64-bit Java JDK or JRE
> >
> > Not necessarily true. I run both 32- and 64-bit versions of the JVM on my
> > Vista 64 box, be
So apparently, I did end up make it more complicated than it is.
Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
From: André Warnier [mailto:a...@ice-sa.com]
Subject: Re: Hello
Vista 32-bit -> 32-bit Java JDK or JRE
Vista 64-bit -> 64-bit Java JDK or JRE
Not necessarily true. I run both 32- and 64-bit ve
> From: André Warnier [mailto:a...@ice-sa.com]
> Subject: Re: Hello
>
> Vista 32-bit -> 32-bit Java JDK or JRE
> Vista 64-bit -> 64-bit Java JDK or JRE
Not necessarily true. I run both 32- and 64-bit versions of the JVM on my
Vista 64 box, because some browsers only come i
Okey Kene wrote:
Hi,
Am using windows vista and i wish to know what version of apache tomcat to download.
Smartass answer :
You can download any version you like, using IE or Firefox.
;-)
..
Less smartass :
If you intend to also run Tomcat under Vista :
(and as a redemption for the
Okey Kene wrote:
Am using windows vista and i wish to know what version of apache tomcat
to download.
Are you planning to write webapps or are you only wishing to deploy
webapps you've acquired from other sources?
If you wish to learn to write JEE webapps, then I recommend the
latest version (
> From: Mehrotra, Anurag [mailto:amehro...@telebright.com]
> Subject: RE: Hello
>
> If you are using vista 64 bit, do not use the windows installer/exe.
Not true, the installer works fine on my Vista 64 box. The tomcat6.exe program
in the installer (and also in the .zip download) i
communication in error, please notify us
immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer.
-Original Message-
From: Caldarale, Charles R [mailto:chuck.caldar...@unisys.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2009 1:47 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Hello
> From: Okey K
Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
From: Okey Kene [mailto:keneo...@yahoo.com]
Subject: Hello
Am using windows vista and i wish to know what version of
apache tomcat to download.
Resisting the temptation to answer "42", ..
i was going to say the unisex version. but i did answer more appropriately.
> From: Okey Kene [mailto:keneo...@yahoo.com]
> Subject: Hello
>
> Am using windows vista and i wish to know what version of
> apache tomcat to download.
Resisting the temptation to answer "42", you should be aware that Tomcat is
pure Java, so any of the downloadable packages are acceptable for u
Okey Kene wrote:
Hi,
Am using windows vista and i wish to know what version of apache tomcat
to download.
cheers!
**
**
**
**
*
*
/Regards.../
/Okey Kene /
either 5.x or 6.0
64bit or 32 b
Dear Okey,
Am using windows vista and i wish to know what version of apache
tomcat to download.
Any version you like.
--
Kees Jan
http://java-monitor.com/forum/
kjkos...@kjkoster.org
06-51838192
Rule 1 for being in a hole: stop digging.
--
hey guys, i just loaded onto a system with a old harddrive a replacement
(different kind of motherboard) and updated/installed a new fedora 9.2
version but cannot get a password to work and all of the user names have
been changed..
any ideas how to get from the main on site console root access
On Sun, 21 Sep 2008 16:54:33 -0400, H. Hall wrote:
> When I installed Netbeans 6.1, the installer also installed Tomcat
> 6.0.14. This was on a windows pc but I would find it very amazing if the
> Linux version of NB6.1 installed a TC 5.5. Is is possible that a
> tomcat installed with Ubuntu?
thufir wrote:
This cuts across IDE, OS and server.
I'm running Ubuntu:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cat /etc/lsb-release
DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu
DISTRIB_RELEASE=8.04
DISTRIB_CODENAME=hardy
DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="Ubuntu 8.04.1"
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo apt-get upda
On Fri, 19 Sep 2008 10:10:20 -0400, Steve Ochani wrote:
>> Now rather than recriminating at aeternum, does anyone know how to
>> track down said packager, so that maybe he could come here and see the
>> errors of his ways, or at least explain his logic here ? Same as for
>> Debian Tomcat5.5 itsel
Send reply to: Tomcat Users List
Date sent: Fri, 19 Sep 2008 09:09:11 +0200
From: André Warnier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: hello world
> Now rather than recriminating at aeternum, do
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
> Subject: Re: hello world
>
> Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
> >> From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of thufir
> >> Subject: Re: hello world
> >>
> >> If Apache installs then why not tomcat?
> >
> > Apache is a sof
Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of thufir
Subject: Re: hello world
If Apache installs then why not tomcat?
Apache is a software organization with numerous products; if by "Apache" you
mean httpd, it may be because the 3rd-party developer
> From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of thufir
> Subject: Re: hello world
>
> If Apache installs then why not tomcat?
Apache is a software organization with numerous products; if by "Apache" you
mean httpd, it may be because the 3rd-party developers are more fam
On Thu, 18 Sep 2008 09:50:18 -0500, Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
>> Do I need to install Tomcat 5.5 from Ubuntu
>
> We've had no end of problems with 3rd-party repackaged versions of
> Tomcat.
Ok, yeah, I've seen mention of that, but thought that must be in error.
If Apache installs then why not
On Thu, 18 Sep 2008 11:02:42 -0400, Brantley Hobbs wrote:
>> I thought mentats weren't supposed to use computers...
>>
Later on they do :)
>>
> No matter what, the spice must flow. If it takes a computer, it takes a
> computer.
Yes :)
-Thufir
---
Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of thufir
Subject: hello world
I'm running Ubuntu:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$
I thought mentats weren't supposed to use computers...
No matter what, the spice must flow. If it takes a computer, it takes a
comput
> From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of thufir
> Subject: hello world
>
> I'm running Ubuntu:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$
I thought mentats weren't supposed to use computers...
> Do I need to install Tomcat 5.5 from Ubuntu
We've had no end of problems with 3rd-party repackaged versions of
58 matches
Mail list logo
