Hi Tim,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But now I have a load balancer in place, with one worker. A status is
shown below after about 6hrs of traffic. As you can see the client
errors make up about 6% of all incident traffic, though they dwarf
server errors.
Acc Err CE RE Wr Rd
9
To: Tomcat Users List
Cc: Ludwig,GJA,Graeme,DGE R
Subject: Re: ISAPI JK2 ran better than JK, how can that be?
Hi Tim,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi Rainer,
>
> Thanks for the response. To cover a few points you made -
>
> - Yes, I had a hunch long running requests are a proble
Rainer
From: Rainer Jung [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Mon
10/12/2007 12:11 To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: ISAPI JK2 ran
better than JK, how can that be?
Hi Tim,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK,
So our website keeps crashing over the past couple of w
ect: Re: ISAPI JK2 ran better than JK, how can that be?
Hi Tim,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> OK,
>
> So our website keeps crashing over the past couple of weeks (usual
> story on this list eh?)
Not really (although a users list is always focused on problems and not
on the working sid
JK2 ran better than JK, how can that be?
Hi Tim
non server products like Windows 2000 Professional or Windows XP the number
of concurrent connections is limited to 10.
This is discussed in Mladens article located at
http://people.apache.org/~mturk/docs/articl
Hi Tim
non server products like Windows 2000 Professional or Windows XP the number
of concurrent connections is limited to 10.
This is discussed in Mladens article located at
http://people.apache.org/~mturk/docs/article/ftwai.html
M-
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Cc:
Hi Tim,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK,
So our website keeps crashing over the past couple of weeks (usual
story on this list eh?)
Not really (although a users list is always focused on problems and not
on the working side of things ...)
We've been running JK isapi plugin v1.2.15 for a fair
