> From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
> Subject: Re: Showing Tomcat Memory Utilization with 'top'
>
> I didn't realize that the server JVM didn't share class
> templates. Do you have any ideas why not?
AFAIK, Sun just hadn'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chuck,
On 6/22/2010 5:00 PM, Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
>> From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
>> Subject: Re: Showing Tomcat Memory Utilization with 'top'
>>
>> Also, I believe VIRT
> From: Robinson, Eric [mailto:eric.robin...@psmnv.com]
> Subject: RE: Showing Tomcat Memory Utilization with 'top'
>
> 'top' shows 30-40MB in the 'SHR' column for each java
> process. Is that what you're referring to?
That could be any memory (
> From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
> Subject: Re: Showing Tomcat Memory Utilization with 'top'
>
> Also, I believe VIRT includes memory shared with other processes
Doesn't RES also include shared pages - anything that's in the memor
> Also, I believe VIRT includes memory shared with other
> processes, so if you have 50MiB of Java system classes
> loaded and a modern JVM which shares them among running JVMs,
> then you'll see that 50MiB included in every process's VIRT
> that is sharing it, which is somewhat misleading.
E
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chuck,
On 6/22/2010 3:22 PM, Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
>> From: Robinson, Eric [mailto:eric.robin...@psmnv.com]
>> Subject: Showing Tomcat Memory Utilization with 'top'
>>
>> 1. Top shows 0k of swap usage, so the system is not swapping. In that
>> c
> From: Robinson, Eric [mailto:eric.robin...@psmnv.com]
> Subject: RE: Showing Tomcat Memory Utilization with 'top'
>
> For example, I have a tomcat configured to use 96MB of heap (export
> JAVA_OPTS="-ms96M -mx96M"). Top shows VIRT=336396, RES=227264. I&#x
>> 2. Where does the 64MB of java heap show up?
> Buried inside the VIRT number.
For example, I have a tomcat configured to use 96MB of heap (export
JAVA_OPTS="-ms96M -mx96M"). Top shows VIRT=336396, RES=227264. I'm
guessing that the 96MB of heap is buried in BOTH the VIRT and RES
numbers?
--
E
> From: Robinson, Eric [mailto:eric.robin...@psmnv.com]
> Subject: Showing Tomcat Memory Utilization with 'top'
>
> 1. Top shows 0k of swap usage, so the system is not swapping. In that
> case, why is there a difference between the VIRT and RES numbers?
Linux always allocates more virtual space t
