Hey Dave B. ,
My question from chris was for your benefit.
default configuration is not the same thing as vendor neutral.
chris wrote: > If you use both, you should be all set for whichever pool
you use at
runtime. DOH !
>If you look in your log file, you will notice that when Tomcat starts
On Sat, Jan 4, 2020 at 2:47 AM Dave Bothwell
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am using Tomcat 8.5.11 with JDBC connection pooling. Based on the
> documentation it is clear that DBCP pooling has changed the maxActive
> attribute to maxTotal. However it is unclear, based on this document
>
chris,
Is commons-dbcp-2.x a Database pooling component for any container
Jetty,Jboss tomcat etc. ?
is commons-dbcp-2.x a third option, separate option from the two pooling
options [tomcat-pool and commons-pool] you mentioned ?
On 03/01/2020 23:21, Dave Bothwell wrote:
Chris,
That
Chris,
That was very helpful.
Thank you
Dave
On Fri, Jan 3, 2020 at 5:29 PM Christopher Schultz <
ch...@christopherschultz.net> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Dave,
>
> On 1/3/20 13:47, Dave Bothwell wrote:
> > I am using Tomcat 8.5.11 with JDBC connection
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Dave,
On 1/3/20 13:47, Dave Bothwell wrote:
> I am using Tomcat 8.5.11 with JDBC connection pooling. Based on
> the documentation it is clear that DBCP pooling has changed the
> maxActive attribute to maxTotal. However it is unclear, based on
>
|I hope these descriptions of the setting helps you in making a decision
as to the value.
|
|maxActive| (int) The maximum number of active connections that can be
allocated from this pool at the same time. The default value is |100|||
|
|
On 03/01/2020 18:47, Dave Bothwell wrote:
Hello,
Am 22.01.2016 um 12:35 schrieb R. Sriram:
Hello I am trying to establish connection pooling.
Should I be using dbcp?
If you want to use db connection pooling, it is probably a good idea to
use the pooling method the container gives you, as it will be used by a
lot of people and therefore has
I'm using the connection pooling on Tomcat 6.
And in my case i had to put the jar from the jdbc driver on.
$CATALINA_HOME/lib
On Jan 4, 2008 2:05 PM, Scott McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
We are about to start testing the jdbc connection pooling capabilities
within tomcat. I don't have
As you've described it using tomcat's JNDI resources, the driver has to
be in common/lib. If the application defines and manages it's own pool
separate from tomcat, then you could put it in the app's WEB-INF/lib
folder. This has everything to do with how the classloaders work.
Since tomcat
From: Scott McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: jdbc connection pooling
The developer says that the jar file containing the
database driver should be published within the web
applications WEB-INF/lib folder while I say it should
be in $CATALINA_HOME/common/lib.
You are
On Fri, 2008-01-04 at 10:23 -0600, Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
From: Scott McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: jdbc connection pooling
The developer says that the jar file containing the
database driver should be published within the web
applications WEB-INF/lib folder
On Fri, 2008-01-04 at 14:12 -0200, Diego wrote:
I'm using the connection pooling on Tomcat 6.
And in my case i had to put the jar from the jdbc driver on.
$CATALINA_HOME/lib
On Jan 4, 2008 2:05 PM, Scott McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
We are about to start testing the jdbc
From: Scott McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: jdbc connection pooling
I'm going to try my best to not sound ignorant but can you better
explain what you mean when you say tomcat manages the connections
compared to if the application (using the same apache commons
projects
On Fri, 2008-01-04 at 11:16 -0600, Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
From: Scott McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: jdbc connection pooling
I'm going to try my best to not sound ignorant but can you better
explain what you mean when you say tomcat manages the connections
NOT in the WEB-INF/lib -- put in the common/lib - that's where it goes.
You might get very erratic performance putting the jar file in both places.
make sure you know how to configure either your server.xml file or respective
META-INF/ .xml file appropriately. Depends on which TC version you
This sounds like poor coding to me. Your application should get the
connection object from the pool and immediately release when done. Having
an application hold onto a connection (especially in client/server) world is
bound to cause you to run out of connections or reach timeouts.
On 5/2/06,
You're absolutelly right Marc,
but the connection is being described by the connection context
containing the username and the password. Each application has its own
DB account, so as you have written bellow, the application gives the
connection back to the pool BUT only the same
17 matches
Mail list logo
