Re: [External] Re: CVE-2014-7810 Mitigation

2015-06-25 Thread André Warnier
to be informed, isn't it ?) From: André Warnier [a...@ice-sa.com] Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2015 8:32 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: [External] Re: CVE-2014-7810 Mitigation Lynch, Charles [USA] wrote: You are saying a malicious actor would need

RE: [External] Re: CVE-2014-7810 Mitigation

2015-06-25 Thread Lynch, Charles [USA]
You are saying a malicious actor would need to be on the server itself to load an application? From: André Warnier [a...@ice-sa.com] Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2015 7:55 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: [External] Re: CVE-2014-7810 Mitigation Lynch, Charles [USA]

RE: [External] Re: CVE-2014-7810 Mitigation

2015-06-25 Thread Lynch, Charles [USA]
] Re: CVE-2014-7810 Mitigation Lynch, Charles [USA] wrote: You are saying a malicious actor would need to be on the server itself to load an application? Basically yes, or be allowed to load and deploy applications via the Manager application (which is either not installed, or anyway secured

Re: [External] Re: CVE-2014-7810 Mitigation

2015-06-25 Thread André Warnier
Lynch, Charles [USA] wrote: You are saying a malicious actor would need to be on the server itself to load an application? Basically yes, or be allowed to load and deploy applications via the Manager application (which is either not installed, or anyway secured by default) It is fairly

Re: [External] Re: CVE-2014-7810 Mitigation

2015-06-25 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 André, On 6/25/15 8:32 AM, André Warnier wrote: Lynch, Charles [USA] wrote: You are saying a malicious actor would need to be on the server itself to load an application? Basically yes, or be allowed to load and deploy applications via the