On 31/10/2011 20:22, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> 2011/11/1 Christopher Schultz :
>> I'm having trouble locating the code that auto-undeploys old versions
>> when all sessions have expired.
>
> There is no such code in Tomcat.
>
> You will see in the manager app that the counter of sessions is zer
2011/11/1 Christopher Schultz :
> I'm having trouble locating the code that auto-undeploys old versions
> when all sessions have expired.
There is no such code in Tomcat.
You will see in the manager app that the counter of sessions is zero,
but there is no such feature as automatic undeployment h
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mark,
On 10/28/2011 5:20 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> And the code says...?
Knowing that you'd say that, I had started looking for the code.
Unfortunately it's hard to search through 1200 source files for the
place where a Context is instantiated using r
Ah yes. Thanks Chuck. That makes more sense. =)
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 3:04 PM, Caldarale, Charles R
wrote:
>> From: Ellecer Valencia [mailto:elle...@gmail.com]
>> Subject: Re: Rollback in Tomcat7 under parallel deployment
>
>> But how would it cause an outage? ROOT##003
> From: Ellecer Valencia [mailto:elle...@gmail.com]
> Subject: Re: Rollback in Tomcat7 under parallel deployment
> But how would it cause an outage? ROOT##003 would not necessarily be
> copied from the file ROOT##001.war
I believe Chris was referring to your originally stated ta
Hi Chris,
But how would it cause an outage? ROOT##003 would not necessarily be
copied from the file ROOT##001.war
It'll be a separate deployment, but just using the same build that got
deployed as ROOT##001.
Whether ROOT##001 is marked for undeployment should not make a
difference to ROOT##003.
On 29/10/2011 12:41, chris derham wrote:
>>
>>> Also, what happens if ROOT##001 and ##002 have the same log4j configs
>>> and are writing to the same log file?? How have people handled this
>>> situation?
>>
>> You'll certainly end up with both apps writing to the same file. Whether
>> or not that
>
> > Also, what happens if ROOT##001 and ##002 have the same log4j configs
> > and are writing to the same log file?? How have people handled this
> > situation?
>
> You'll certainly end up with both apps writing to the same file. Whether
> or not that is a problem will depend on exactly how you h
On 28/10/2011 21:53, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> Ellecer,
>
> On 10/27/2011 7:11 PM, Ellecer Valencia wrote:
>> On Thursday, October 27, 2011, Mark Thomas
>> wrote:
>>> A better way to handle the rollback scenario is to deploy a
>>> copy of ROOT##001.war as ROOT#003.war.
>
>> That's the first
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ellecer,
On 10/27/2011 7:11 PM, Ellecer Valencia wrote:
> On Thursday, October 27, 2011, Mark Thomas
> wrote:
>> A better way to handle the rollback scenario is to deploy a copy
>> of ROOT##001.war as ROOT#003.war.
>
> That's the first option we saw
On Thursday, October 27, 2011, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> Also, what happens if ROOT##001 and ##002 have the same log4j configs
>> and are writing to the same log file?? How have people handled this
>> situation?
>
> You'll certainly end up with both apps writing to the same file. Whether
> or not that
On 27/10/2011 07:41, Ellecer Valencia wrote:
> Hi,
>
> If I'm using parallel deployment in Tomcat 7, and now have 2 webapps
>
> /webapps/ROOT##001.war
> /webapps/ROOT##002.war
>
> and then get problems in the new version and want to rollback to
> ROOT##001.war.
>
> If I delete the more recent
Hi,
If I'm using parallel deployment in Tomcat 7, and now have 2 webapps
/webapps/ROOT##001.war
/webapps/ROOT##002.war
and then get problems in the new version and want to rollback to ROOT##001.war.
If I delete the more recent version by doing
rm /tomcat/webapps/ROOT##002.war
What happens to
13 matches
Mail list logo
