My setup is tomcat 5.5.17 + mod_jk 1.2.15 + httpd 2.2.2. I am using AJP1.3.
Every 2-3 days with no major load, tomcat throws the error: "SEVERE: All
threads (200) are currently busy, waiting..."
I have been monitoring my tomcat TP-Processor thread behavior over extended
time intervals and observ
: Wednesday, May 13, 2009 2:28 PM
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: Running out of tomcat threads - why many threads in RUNNABLE stage
even with no activity
My setup is tomcat 5.5.17 + mod_jk 1.2.15 + httpd 2.2.2. I am using AJP1.3.
Every 2-3 days with no major load, tomcat throws the error: "S
: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Running out of tomcat threads - why many threads in RUNNABLE stage
even with no activity
I set connectionTimeout in server.xml to 60 and now the RUNNABLE threads go
back to WAITING stage after that time.
But our other servers which are running the same
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Vishwajit,
On 5/13/2009 5:28 PM, Pantvaidya, Vishwajit wrote:
> My setup is tomcat 5.5.17 + mod_jk 1.2.15 + httpd 2.2.2. I am using
> AJP1.3.
Old versions of everything. Consider upgrading?
> Every 2-3 days with no major load, tomcat throws the
Hi Chris,
Thanks for your reply.
>
> On 5/13/2009 5:28 PM, Pantvaidya, Vishwajit wrote:
> > My setup is tomcat 5.5.17 + mod_jk 1.2.15 + httpd 2.2.2. I am using
> > AJP1.3.
>
> Old versions of everything. Consider upgrading?
>
[Pantvaidya, Vishwajit] Yes, sure - we will upgrade at some poin
On 13.05.2009 23:28, Pantvaidya, Vishwajit wrote:
> My setup is tomcat 5.5.17 + mod_jk 1.2.15 + httpd 2.2.2. I am using
> AJP1.3. Every 2-3 days with no major load, tomcat throws the error:
> "SEVERE: All threads (200) are currently busy, waiting..."
>
> I have been monitoring my tomcat TP-Proce
On 14.05.2009 20:29, Pantvaidya, Vishwajit wrote:
> I set connectionTimeout in server.xml to 60 and now the RUNNABLE
> threads go back to WAITING stage after that time.
>
> But our other servers which are running the same configuration, same
> webapp and do not have connectionTimeout set in se
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Vishwajit,
On 5/18/2009 2:01 PM, Pantvaidya, Vishwajit wrote:
> Yes, sure - we will upgrade at some point of
> time. But since upgrading all our servers will be some work, that may
> not happen right away.
Upgrading mod_jk is the least painful of all
> [Pantvaidya, Vishwajit] Here are figures from 3 of the servers which have
> not yet run out of threads (so the thread count does not add up to 200). I
> have taken these late at night when no users are present, so I was
> expecting all threads to be Waiting for tomcat thread-pool.
>
> 1. Total
> > [Pantvaidya, Vishwajit] Here are figures from 3 of the servers which
> have
> > not yet run out of threads (so the thread count does not add up to 200).
> I
> > have taken these late at night when no users are present, so I was
> > expecting all threads to be Waiting for tomcat thread-pool
Yes, those two look like "waiting for next request on an existing
connection from the web server to Tomcat" and "sitting idle in the pool,
waiting for a new connection to handle".
On 18.05.2009 22:44, Pantvaidya, Vishwajit wrote:
>>> [Pantvaidya, Vishwajit] Here are figures from 3 of the servers w
> -Original Message-
> From: Rainer Jung [mailto:rainer.j...@kippdata.de]
> Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 2:43 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: Running out of tomcat threads - why many threads in RUNNABLE
> stage even with no activity
>
> Yes, those two loo
> > Yes, sure - we will upgrade at some point of
> > time. But since upgrading all our servers will be some work, that may
> > not happen right away.
>
> Upgrading mod_jk is the least painful of all of these, and the most
> likely to affect you.
>
[Pantvaidya, Vishwajit] I understand and agree an
> From: Caldarale, Charles R [mailto:chuck.caldar...@unisys.com]
> Subject: RE: Running out of tomcat threads - why many threads
> inRUNNABLEstage even with no activity
>
> > > - Setting connectionTimeout in server.xml seems to have resolved
> > > the issue
>
> Only because you're throwing away w
On 20.05.2009 19:47, Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
>> From: Caldarale, Charles R [mailto:chuck.caldar...@unisys.com]
>> Subject: RE: Running out of tomcat threads - why many threads
>> inRUNNABLEstage even with no activity
>>
- Setting connectionTimeout in server.xml seems to have resolved
> -Original Message-
> From: Rainer Jung [mailto:rainer.j...@kippdata.de]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2009 11:53 AM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: Running out of tomcat threads - why many threads in RUNNABLE
> stage even with no activity
>
> On 20.05.2009 1
> -Original Message-
> From: Rainer Jung [mailto:rainer.j...@kippdata.de]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2009 11:53 AM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: Running out of tomcat threads - why many threads in RUNNABLE
> stage even with no activity
>
> On 20.05.2009 1
Pantvaidya, Vishwajit wrote:
- why do the 11 threads in the httpd o/p show port 21069 in foreign addr. Or are those not the correct threads I should be looking at?a A bit off-topic maybe, but if you add "-p" to netstat (at least under
Linux), it will also show the program that corresponds to th
> From: André Warnier [mailto:a...@ice-sa.com]
> Subject: Re: Running out of tomcat threads - why many threads in
> RUNNABLEstage even with no activity
> if you add "-p" to netstat (at least under Linux), it will also
> show the program that corresponds to that line.
Or at least -o to show the p
> From: Martin Gainty [mailto:mgai...@hotmail.com]
> Subject: RE: Running out of tomcat threads - why many threads in
> RUNNABLEstage even with no activity
> http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/wasinfo/v4r0/index.jsp?topic=/
> com.ibm.support.was40.doc/html/Plug_in/swg21163659.html
Vaguely i
> This FAQ entry looks promising:
> http://tomcat.apache.org/connectors-doc/miscellaneous/faq.html
>
> Look at the entry entitled "I've got a firewall between my web server and
> Tomcat which drops ajp13 connections after some time".
>
> Configuring keep-alives is a fairly low-overhead workaround
> From: Pantvaidya, Vishwajit [mailto:vpant...@selectica.com]
> Subject: RE: Running out of tomcat threads - why many threads in
> RUNNABLEstage even with no activity
>
> So socket_keepalive is already 1. So does this mean that firewall is
> dropping connections in spite of it.
The doc does not m
Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
>> From: André Warnier [mailto:a...@ice-sa.com]
>> Subject: Re: Running out of tomcat threads - why many threads in
>> RUNNABLEstage even with no activity
>
>> if you add "-p" to netstat (at least under Linux), it will also
>> show the program that corresponds to that
> From: Pid [mailto:p...@pidster.com]
> Subject: Re: Running out of tomcat threads - why many threads in
> RUNNABLEstage even with no activity
>
> I am not a number!
But are you a free man?
We want information, by hook or by crook...
(Apologies to the late Patrick McGoohan.)
- Chuck
THIS CO
Trying to add some info below.
On 21.05.2009 05:09, Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
>> From: Pantvaidya, Vishwajit [mailto:vpant...@selectica.com]
>> Subject: RE: Running out of tomcat threads - why many threads in
>> RUNNABLEstage even with no activity
>>
>> So socket_keepalive is already 1. So does
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Vishwajit,
On 5/19/2009 6:08 PM, Pantvaidya, Vishwajit wrote:
>> No, Tomcat uses precisely 1 thread to handle each incoming HTTP
>> request. If keepalives are used, multiple requests may be handled
>> by the same thread before it is returned to the po
>
> 1) If you want to analyze your original problem, you need to get back to
> the original situation, i.e. without connectionTimeout. It doesn't make
> much sense to guess about the original problem by looking at something
> very different.
[Pantvaidya, Vishwajit] Yes - I have already initiated
On 21.05.2009 20:59, Pantvaidya, Vishwajit wrote:
>> 3) I think I already indicated that you do not want to look at entries
>> in TIME_WAIT state. This state is special and not related to any threads
>
> [Pantvaidya, Vishwajit] My netstat o/p had FIN_WAIT and CLOSE_WAIT, but not
> TIMED_WAIT. Did
> From: Pantvaidya, Vishwajit [mailto:vpant...@selectica.com]
> Subject: RE: Running out of tomcat threads - why many threads in
> RUNNABLEstage even with no activity
>
> [Pantvaidya, Vishwajit] Why are connections idle for a
> long time not good?
He didn't say they weren't good, he said they we
Pid wrote:
I am not a number!
That betrays your age too, you know that ?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
30 matches
Mail list logo