On Mar 15, 2013, at 10:21 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
> Otherwise it'll just slow you down.
That's what I was looking for. I didn't see any indication anywhere that OCSP
came with a performance hit, so my thought was, "why wouldn't you just always
use the OCSP version?" Thanks for clarifying this.
On 03/15/2013 02:39 AM, Nick Williams wrote:
Can anyone shed some light on when you would pick standard and when you would
pick OCSP?
I think that's usage is self explanatory. Use OCSP if you need OCSP :)
Otherwise it'll just slow you down.
Since the current implementation does not have enab
